Once that baby is born his life is going to be "over" so I think this is a pretty clear-cut case of self-defense.
You are too blinded by your hatred of the media to look honestly at this, or any national situation. When dark shadows are everywhere you can't see anything. Conspiracies exist, but not everywhere all the time. When you look for it in everything you find it everywhere, even where there is nothing. Just like people who look for Jesus in everything and then find him on a cheese pizza or potato chip. Brother, you see conspiracies in your pizza. Back the fuck up, realize regardless of the legality of his past killing or how different news sites portrayed it differently, this dude is an asshole and smelly piece of shit.
He may be, but again that's neither here nor there. My link proves my point beyond any doubt. 90% of what you are basing your judgement on is bullshit fiction. Take 5 minutes to educate yourself on the reality of why a jury found him not guilty. Then you can apologize for doubting me.
You are assuming I believe something I don't. I think he is an ass and that the law is bad. I don't think he is legally guilty, I think the jury made the correct decision based on some shitty law. Also, I am fully award of media bias. My point I'd that you are in such a mad frenzy about anything that touches on the media, or a conspiracy, or freedoms, that you (like you just did) assume that nobody else has reason or knowledge, that there is only one correct view, and that if people only knew they would agree with you. People these days, if they are interested, can pretty easily find better news sources and get fairly accurate information it it exists at all. But, there are still differing opinions.
How many times has this asshole waved his gun in a woman's face now? 3? Yeah, he's a prince among men.
I make no assumptions but you clearly didn't follow the case or allowed yourself to be lied to. The law you refer to, that MAJORMEDIA lied about, never had anything to do with the case. It was never mentioned and was not applicable.
Women just call the cops on him for no reason? And the jury instructions absolutely detailed the stand your ground law. So it was absolutely and undeniably what the case was about. A shitty law that needs to be reconsidered.
The girlfriend isn't pregnant. She also says that Zimmerman completely changed after his acquittal, to the point of being suicidal. "He was Georgie..."
As a fake lawyer, you should be aware jury instructions cover all kinds of things which may or may not arise, hypotheticals, possible avenues of defense and anticipated questions about meals and talking to people about the case. Doesn't make any of it relevant. It's an excellent law, but it was not applicable in this very basic act of self-defense.
He was granted a restraining order against the first one. The second refused to press charges. The current one probably sees him as a ticket to MAJORMEDIA money.
