I think Kevin Pelton is a bit of a tool(check out his 16-20). I cant agree with any of his choices (top 20 anyway). I also cant agree with anyone who has Kobe at anything other 1 or 2http://www.nba.com/sonics/news/top100_sep06.html
Wow Kevin Pelton... wtf man? Kobe at 3? Shaq at 19?! What a joke... David's seems the most reasonable for me although I didnt look at everything, just all their top 30's
Sounds like Kevin Pelton wanted to be different, you could kind of tell by his comments...He built up Wade and James without really talking about Bryant...
I exited it when I saw David Locke's "100-91". What a dumbass Raptor hater.He puts Josh Childress, Matt Harpring, and freaking Hedo Turkoglu over Mo Pete, and Jason Williams over TJ Ford. And he also puts Devin Harris, and Speedy Claxton over TJ as well.Numbnuts.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CB4AllStar @ Oct 8 2006, 10:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I exited it when I saw David Locke's "100-91". What a dumbass Raptor hater.He puts Josh Childress, Matt Harpring, and freaking Hedo Turkoglu over Mo Pete, and Jason Williams over TJ Ford. And he also puts Devin Harris, and Speedy Claxton over TJ as well.Numbnuts.</div>I can understand that because 100 NBA players is hard to keep perfect, to me maybe the top 20 or even 30 are the ones that count. Past that it's really a big toss up.
How can you understand all those guys going before the Raptors? Obviously he isnt giving them credit because they play for the Raps.