More embassy personnel died under Bush than under Obama. Why no arrests? Why no detailed reports to the public or press? Why no Fox expose'?
If you two guys do meet up, please have someone videotape it and post a link. It is the least you can do.
There were two hot wars and a war on terror going on in the Bush years. Obama's spikin' it in the end zone that we defeated Al Qaeda. That Benhazi looks like he spiked it at the 5 yard line like an idiot and photoshopped the instant replay to look like he was in the end zone is the issue.
http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/obamas-unseemly-end-zone-dance/2012/05/09/ The Corpsman at the VA Hospital love him too. They all introduce themselves as "Corpse Man" now. I put near split a gut when I was over there at the Roseburg VA hospital and a Corpsman came up to me and introduced himself as "Corpse Man" Kelley! Damn you would think someone would clue the fuckup in once in awhile.
Well wonderful Sly, Make sure you get someone to invite the Jillpoke to the next Blazer function. He promises to entertain.
NYT had a reporter alongside the Benghazi murders. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...ing-to-the-Attackers-During-Benghazi-Massacre
"Pure intimidation" described by FauxNews, er, CNN. [video=youtube;eocpTZD3xAQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eocpTZD3xAQ#t=13[/video]
That's right. Bush started 2 wars for the MIC and sacrificed 3,000 American servicemen, in addition to failing to protect our embassies from 13 deadly attacks. We could point out how Bush got Americans killed on every continent on Earth and has likely caused the deaths of our great-grandchildren but you're straying from the point of the thread which is to blame dems and praise reps for the exact same acts.
It's not our job to protect our embassies. It's the job of the nations where the embassies are located. In Iraq, where we were occupiers, we made the green zone, which was as protected from deadly attacks as can be. JFK's and LBJ's hot war killed 50,000+, but who's counting? I don't praise the republicans for any of this. I just don't think they lied about any attacks the day after for political gain.
While playing politics with CIA secrets, Republicans know that Obama can't open up about why the Benghazi consulate had to maintain low visibility, and thus had to rely upon Libyan government security instead of importing American troops to protect it. CNN says, at 4:45, that what is being covered up is that the CIA used Benghazi as a waystation to move SAMs from the U.S. to Libya to Turkey to Syrian terrorists trying to overthrow Assad. I (and the hypocritical Fox News) always knew there was a legitimate CIA reason for ignoring Republicans playing politics with national secrets.
No excuse not to defend the ambassador and his people there. Was this CIA base going to be used after the alamo type slaughter?
