<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 31 2006, 06:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>your heartbeat is off</div>I'm beginning to believe that your brain is off...
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fouled Out @ Oct 31 2006, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'm beginning to believe that your brain is off...</div>oh snap...that didn't really hurt
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 31 2006, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>oh snap...that didn't really hurt</div>Dude you a little pussy who thinks he is tough on the internet so just quit already.I would take Lakers because look at their recent game against the Suns No Kobe or Brown. And we still beat "Mr.MVP" team. OK it only one game but we have better chemistry than you. JO and Tinley are injury prones. Harrington is good and underrated but you are overrating Granger. Granger has a future but no 44 minutes I am only thinking maybe 25 minutes a game.
Pinoy chill out. Don't call him names just because he doesn't have any post maturity and has little knowledge and support in all of his posts. He will improve in time.The Lakers are the choice here. While the Pacers did improve when they got Al Harrington back the Lakers are just a better team IMO. We could do it with comparing the big two for each team:Kobe-Odom >> O'Neal-HarringtonThe rest of the supporting cast is fairly equal. The coaching edge goes to Phil Jackson obviously, so I think that the Lakers are the better team.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pinoy Balla @ Nov 1 2006, 10:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Dude you a little pussy who thinks he is tough on the internet so just quit already.I would take Lakers because look at their recent game against the Suns No Kobe or Brown. And we still beat "Mr.MVP" team. OK it only one game but we have better chemistry than you. JO and Tinley are injury prones. Harrington is good and underrated but you are overrating Granger. Granger has a future but no 44 minutes I am only thinking maybe 25 minutes a game.</div>there is a thing called potential, which alot of you think bynum has...just know this, granger has the most potential of anyone on the lakers or pacers, it's only up to him to step into it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Nov 1 2006, 03:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>there is a thing called potential, which alot of you think bynum has...just know this, granger has the most potential of anyone on the lakers or pacers, it's only up to him to step into it.</div>Yeah you know nothing about basketball at all. Your just a biased Pacers fan who thinks he knows everything and is never wrong. Andrew Bynum has no potential. That's why he scored 18 points last night and got 9 boards against the Suns. If that isn't showing a flash of potential I don't know what is. Oh yeah btw I'm looking foward to seeign Granger play atleast 40 minutes tonite and get 2 steals and 2 blocks :happy0144:
Hmmm that's weird. At halftime Granger has only played 14 minutes so far and has no steals or blocks yet. Wow I though for sure he would've played atleast 20 minutes by now and atleast had 1 steal and block :HAHAHA:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Nov 1 2006, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah you know nothing about basketball at all. Your just a biased Pacers fan who thinks he knows everything and is never wrong. Andrew Bynum has no potential. That's why he scored 18 points last night and got 9 boards against the Suns. If that isn't showing a flash of potential I don't know what is. Oh yeah btw I'm looking foward to seeign Granger play atleast 40 minutes tonite and get 2 steals and 2 blocks :happy0144:</div>when did I say bynum has no potential?I put him in a different thread all about his potentialBtw- We're talking about season averages here, not game statistics<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (iversonfan268 @ Nov 1 2006, 08:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hmmm that's weird. At halftime Granger has only played 14 minutes so far and has no steals or blocks yet. Wow I though for sure he would've played atleast 20 minutes by now and atleast had 1 steal and block :HAHAHA:</div>we're talking about the season statistics, not the game statistics
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pacers fan forever @ Oct 28 2006, 06:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>:HAHAHA: only the desperat in need of a comeback say bynum and farmar have potential :HAHAHA:man that's just sad, if I were you I'd be embarrased right now :HAHAHA: that sounds great for a team with no talent - we support each other when we lose by twenty and kobe takes all the shots in the game :HAHAHA: :HAHAHA: :HAHAHA: :HAHAHA: :HAHAHA:</div>You said he has no potential right there. Also I'm talking about season stats. The point is 26 minutes is a lot different than 40 minutes. The Pacers showed tonite they will be rotating players in and out a lot. Saying Granger will average 40 mpg over the season is a total joke.
