Re: Who's starting at the 2? I didn't say anything about Armstrong of last year. I've been talking about Armstrong in general and than my last comment specifically mentioned Armstrong of 2 years ago just to be more exact. After Daniel's got injured I was hoping Stackhouse wouldn't take all the minutes but when Daniels was healthy and in the starting lineup I was assuming he would keep it based on how he was playing. Bad luck turned his season upside down and than Griffin gets signed and bullsh** after that.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>I didn't say anything about Armstrong of last year. I've been talking about Armstrong in general and than my last comment specifically mentioned Armstrong of 2 years ago just to be more exact.</div> What a bunch of bullsh**. You clearly meant Armstrong of last year. Why would you bring up Armstrong 2 years ago when he was the backup to Terry and clearly not a third string pg. Besides that, the roster was more different 2 years ago then this past season. No one brings up a player's replacement 2 years ago on a roster. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Otherwise he is just the replacement for Darrell Armstrong imo.</div> That's supposed to mean replacement of Armstrong 2 years ago? When someone says that regarding a player who left and another player was brought in, they mean the past season, especially in this case. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>PG Terry/Harris/Johnson</div> You put Johnson as the third string pg here, which is more fitting by your saying of a Armstrong replacement last year then 2 years ago.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? Armstrong of 2 years ago was a third string point guard most the time though he swapped with Harris occassionally. I was think of Johnson in those same terms. I never said of Armstrong year ago so it could mean 1 year or 2 years. You interpreted it as 1 year ago.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Armstrong of 2 years ago was a third string point guard most the time though he swapped with Harris occassionally. I was think of Johnson in those same terms. I never said of Armstrong year ago so it could mean 1 year or 2 years. You interpreted it as 1 year ago.</div> Whatever man, your point makes zero sense. With Johnson being replaced with Armstrong this year, you don't bring up his role on this team 2 years ago. I already brought up your quotes that say otherwise. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Armstrong of 2 years ago was a third string point guard most the time though he swapped with Harris occassionally.</div> When Avery took over, keyword Avery, Harris was on a short leash and gave the majority of the backup minutes to Armstrong.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? Yeah it is the keyword and it wasn't till the playoffs when Harris was in a slump against the rockets (against Mike James) that Armstrong took his spot. Harris couldn't handle the power of Mike James but would've been a better fit against Phoenix rather than Armstrong.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah it is the keyword and it wasn't till the playoffs when Harris was in a slump against the rockets (against Mike James) that Armstrong took his spot.</div> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Armstrong in his first year here did get some meaningful minutes and even backed up Terry instead of Harris.</div> Contradiction? I would say yes.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? Contradiction is that he OCCASIONALLY backed up Terry. Not that he did it all the time. Once again you try to find something that wasn't there in my posts.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Contradiction is that he OCCASIONALLY backed up Terry.</div> Um why did you capitilize occasionally like you said it? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Once again you try to find something that wasn't there in my posts.</div> It is there, if you can't see, it's because your indenial. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>even backed up Terry instead of Harris.</div> Read that sentence and tell me it doesn't mean Armstrong backed up Terry over Harris. This is worthless because it's obvious your someone who can't be wrong.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? Well I meant to say that occassionally. I guess you interpret what I said differently that what I meant. I thought I said "and at times" which is the same as occassionally.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Well I meant to say that occassionally. I guess you interpret what I said differently that what I meant. I thought I said "and at times" which is the same as occassionally.</div> Well you didn't say "and at times" either. So shut the F*ck up about me not intepreting words that are not there. If you want people to know what your talking, then type it, otherwise you look stupid as you do now. And if that comes off harsh, I could care less because I've wasted my time posting towards your comments. Go ahead and repeat that OWNED comment if it makes your head any bigger. Then you might get one of those awards/recognition you highly sought after on this board. And don't say you don't, because I've seen your remarks towards new admin/award topics that have you stating your once again not mentioned or voted for. Rant over.
Re: Who's starting at the 2? Dude I don't why know what you have against me but your knitpicking on words that I occassionally forget to even though that is what I meant pisses me off. No one else gives me such a hard time about nothing like you do. I guess you really like Stackhouse. Since that comment I made about Stackhouse's selfishness you've been looking closely at every flaw you see in my posting. I deserve an award since I put up with you on a daily basis.
