If you're not on the L-Train, what are you waiting for?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Blazer Fanatic, Jan 17, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nah, it was the other guy who said that height correlates to salary, and that, combined with the fact that only 2 players in history have been shorter than 5'6", he might want to have a backup plan.
     
  2. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This. You don't have to believe me, I'm just rehashing stuff I read from a PhD who's a coach, scout and director of analytics for a team.
     
  3. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR

    Why was young Liev Schrieber at the game?
     
  4. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,072
    Likes Received:
    35,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is the thread that never ends... it just goes on and on my friend...
     
  5. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some people started posting stats, not knowing what they were, and they'll continue posting them forever just because....
     
  6. Strenuus

    Strenuus Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,072
    Likes Received:
    35,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well done. Right in rhythm. :lol:
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    67,845
    Likes Received:
    66,602
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then Thabeet must be the best paid player on the planet now that Shawn Bradley has retired? I hope nobody takes my Mugsy Bogues comment seriously because it's not documented or substantiated by scholars at all. I basically pull these things out of a shot glass and throw them at the wall, but that's a sport all it's own. Whenever someone on a msg board says "seriously" I tend to go the opposite direction. Spud Webb maybe would have worked better?
     
  9. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't really know where you're going with this, but ok...
     
  10. 3RA1N1AC

    3RA1N1AC 00110110 00111001

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    20,918
    Likes Received:
    5,168
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ive been on the L train since the day he was drafted, hasn't everyone?
     
  11. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,909
    Likes Received:
    122,904
    Trophy Points:
    115
    LOL!
     
  12. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    ...said everyone reading your posts in this thread, except you...
     
  13. bobf

    bobf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,959
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you use a more accurate measure of efficiency than eFG% then LA is slightly more efficient than last year:

    We basically want points per possession used. The typical formula is

    Points / (FGA + 0.44FTA)

    But we need to include turnovers in that because a TO uses a possession. So...

    Points / (FGA + 0.44FTA + TO)

    By this measure LA is very slightly worse this year
    Last Year .969
    This Year .969

    But even that measure lies a bit because
    - A turnover uses a possession (other team gets the ball 100% of the time)
    - A made shot uses a possession (other team gets the ball 100% of the time)
    - But a missed shot does NOT always use a possession (we ORB 25% of the time)

    So a better-yet measure is of scoring efficiency is

    Points / (FGMade + 0.75FGMissed + 0.44FTA + TO)

    By this measure LA is slighty better than last year

    This year 1.084
    Last year 1.082

    But stats details aside... LA's usage is up significantly which means he gets more attention on defense and that creates openings for teammates. Example: Late in the Spurs game LA was quickly double teamed resulting in an open 3 for Wes. Statwise that played just risked a turnover for LA. But realitywise it helped win that game.
     
  14. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    I'm of your opinion on this, but LMA's usage rate isn't impacted by the ball rotation to Lillard, then Nic, then Wesley, on that possession. That entire basket was based on a double-team to LMA, but it isn't reflected in the stats, as well as LMA's PER, advanced or otherwise. It's why questioning BrianfromWA has become a new pastime here at S2.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2014
  15. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no doubt that he "creates space" or "draws defenders" or "creates openings". It's great to see him pass out of the double, which he's doing (at least to my eyes) better and more consistently this year. I don't even mind open J's. It's the contested 1v1 jumpers that I don't like. If you're going to take a contested shot, take it to the rim where you can get fouled, or shoot better than 42% on it. Especially when you can pass to a guy who's shooting 45% (Dame) or 43% (Wes) from 3.

    He's getting the attention, but he's taking contested, low-percentage shots over the attention rather than kicking it out to someone whose defender has been drawn or who space has been created for, or driving to the hoop where he's elite.
     
  16. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Questioning is great. Listening to the answer helps, though.
     
  17. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And unless I'm totally misreading bobf's post, it's another in the line of stuff that proves that there's nothing significantly different about LMA (at least on the offensive end) from last year's 33-49 LMA to this year's 31-9 LMA. I mean, I get that you hate listening to be drone on, but when eblazer's posts show it, and bobf's posts show it... :dunno:
     
  18. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    On the offensive end, this turnovers are way down and his assists are up. That he's shooting the same and just doing more of the style of shooting isn't really... I mean... Who the fuck cares? Does it mean he's soft? Does it mean he sucks? Does it mean he's not what you want him to be? And if so, who the fuck cares what we want? You or me posting about LaMarcus won't change him. Why the fuck do we torture ourselves? Enjoy the fucking game, fuck off, and go blazers.
     
  19. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    At this point, I'm as lost as you are on your own use of stats anti-LMA/pro-Lillard. Difference is that nobody here is anti-Lillard at all, and understand that he's as much a key to this team as LMA, but w/out the ability to get Wes and Nic wide open 3-point shots.

    I just don't understand your posts today in terms of consistency, and I'm not sure you do, either.
     
  20. PapaG

    PapaG Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    32,870
    Likes Received:
    291
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Tualatin, OR
    Pretty much my point. Why dwell on an obvious statistic that even a n00b can understand? At some point, 31-9 does start to matter, as does leading the NBA in OFF EFF and PPG.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page