There are no bad era's of bball. It is all great. I cant really say that one time is better than anyothers, except that in the mid-late 90's it was very popular over here. Games were actually shown on a weekly basis. So that is my favourite time but by no means is it better than any other period.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>There are no bad era's of bball. It is all great. I cant really say that one time is better than anyothers, except that in the mid-late 90's it was very popular over here. Games were actually shown on a weekly basis. So that is my favourite time but by no means is it better than any other period.</div>I agree with there are no bad era's of bball, I don't really think there's a worst or a best. There have been so many great games and great players that have been produced out of every era, it is hard to put a label on any of them.
I didnt really like the era between the MJ Retirement and 2000... I was alive for that so I guess that's gotta be the worst for me.The best? The 3 peat of course, and reading up on the showtime era and MJ sounded amazing and I wished I could see it...
the NBA was kinda bad when it first started out, the games were slow and offense was really lacking. the addition of the shot clock changed everything though.
1990's were the best. I won an arguement here. There was loads of domination here. The fact that Stockton/Malone, Payton (forget 2006), and Patrick Ewing have never won a title is a perfect example at how much competition was in the 90's.
