Look no further than Richards and Nash

Discussion in 'New York Rangers' started by JD30, Mar 16, 2014.

  1. JD30

    JD30 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Your best players need to be your best every night, not once a month. Just un f'n real !! In 9 games since Olympic vacation break... Brad Richards 1G 3A -5 ... Rick Nash 2G 3A -3. Two losers who make no one around them better players !
     
  2. Messiah717

    Messiah717 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    17,365
    Likes Received:
    4,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Freehold, NJ
    It's what this organization is known for. Very few have come here and not completely crapped the bed. The exceptions are all time legends like Messier, Gartner and Jagr. Not that he's an all time legend but I'll give Gaborik credit for his production as well. For the rest this is where great players come to die.
     
  3. Disturbed

    Disturbed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Software
    Yeah pretty much every established vet stinks when they come to NY. St Louis with zero goals in 7 games after scoring 29 in TB without Stamkos is fitting right in
     
  4. dumpstralmannow

    dumpstralmannow Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Yep. We are destined to be screwed in this game and probably this season. Still would have done the Nash deal. Dubinsky is not worth the money he gets paid. He will be asking for the same crap Callahan did when he gets to the end of 14-15. Dubinsky is greedy and lazy. That being said. I could see the Rangers moving Nash to a team like L.A. in the off-season. A deal around King, Toffoli and Forbort. Something like that where the Rangers add size and toughness with some scoring.
     
  5. Disturbed

    Disturbed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Software
    Who cares at this point. I am so freaking disappointed.
     
  6. JD30

    JD30 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Nash really looks like Lindros did the last few years of his career. Plays on the perimeter most nights and just goes through the motions. Nash has always had the mantle of being a world class player but I have never seen it. He played in anonymity in Columbus and since being here has gotten the benefit of the doubt b/c of the concussions. He has been mostly healthy after an early set back and looked good for only a few nights in January. I really think the guy has nothing where it counts...I really do. He is certainly no go to guy or leader.
     
  7. dumpstralmannow

    dumpstralmannow Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Great talent but not something I would go forward with at this point. On the other hand I had no interest in seeing Dubinsky here at his salary and I know that greedy pig will ask for 6 million after next season. There will be lots of teams interested in Nash because of that talent. A good deal will be there for Sather.
     
  8. JD30

    JD30 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Yeah, Sather may make a deal but has built nothing, has had no gameplan for past 15 years. He is just seat of the pants decision maker. No legitimate C in god knows how long, no offensive D man to help PP, and no tough as nails D man in forever. You can say they have prospects but that is what they are ...prospects until they are allowed to grow and play in the NHL. The head of player development is relied on heavily to evaluate and get their youth ready...how many years has Schoenfeld been here. It's time for Sather and his cronies to get the f out of here. They finally have some talented youth in the last few years and have handled them like shit. Miller and McIlrath should be up here...this team is going nowhere and continues to play crap like Boyle, both Moore's etc. Every year, nothing is done to address needs. It is an organization wide mentality of laziness and no plan
     
  9. dumpstralmannow

    dumpstralmannow Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I think McDonagh is pretty close to being that offensive d-man. He really has stepped up his game this year.
     
  10. Ranger71

    Ranger71 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    When he extended Boyle and Pyatt that said alot about what Sather is seeing in building a team. He makes some shrewd trades but he just dosen't see the little things.
     
  11. chuckd3534

    chuckd3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I agree dump. That is why I am not as concerned with an offensive dman. We need a big physical dman to round out the top 4. Then have Klein and Moore as the 3rd pair until McIlrath is ready. That is a very solid 3rd pair.
     
  12. chuckd3534

    chuckd3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Good point sc. It's almost as if you aren't a big name or big move Sather doesn't see it as important. And what Sather doesn't get is that in 2014 (not 1984) when you have a cap, and the game is more defensive and banging, how you fill out the 3rd and 4th lines, and your bottom 3 dmen really is what drives your team. He simply doesn't get that at all IMO.
     
  13. Ranger71

    Ranger71 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,703
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    He thinks just adding 3 7m players and a great goalie is enough to win. There's no balance between size/skill ratio throughout the lineup.
     
  14. JD30

    JD30 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The team has actually gotten smaller in last 3 years and has the patent on big players who play small (Nash,Staal,Boyle, J Moore and Pouliot- although he has shown some signs of grit. Usually you give up size for speed but this team is as slow as shit except for Kreider and Hagelin. The C position is as dreadful as it comes collectively with zero speed and puck handling thru the neutral zone...very few odd man rushes. After first periods it's usually just 40 foot passes from the D that are re directed into zone with little forcheck....Tortorella's started that with these guys a few yrs back and it is back. A true sign that this team has zero conditioning and is struggling to keep up...just look at Richards- started out well and has now hit a wall.
     
  15. mrmel29

    mrmel29 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    10,406
    Likes Received:
    4,761
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem is in hockey your perceived best players need to be leaders who don't take shit form anyone. Crosby, malkin to name a few will retaliate from a cheap shot by spearing the player who gave it to them and are supported by their teammates. Nash and richards just take it like a couple of soulless players which is hard to watch. Maybe if they cracked their sticks over someones head their teammates might get energized instead of giving the same dumbfounded i have no balls look they give all the time. Pretty clear to see opponents around the league don't respect either one of them and I'm wondering if their teammates feel the same way about them.
     
  16. JD30

    JD30 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    AMEN !
     
  17. Stepupstepan

    Stepupstepan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,423
    Likes Received:
    358
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Maybe Edmonton will bite and take Nash off our hands. We need our picks back in a worst way. We've given up too many picks in the last two years. Edmonton will have a top 3 pick next year. Build the team the right way through the draft and small smart trades. I am sure this wont happen since the good old Glenn is at the helm and will put together half ass team again next year.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2014
  18. Disturbed

    Disturbed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    Software
    This team has lacked top end forward talent....I thought Nash would provide that, he hasn't...yet....if this year is any indication its not happening.

    That said, insert Dubi and AA on this team without Nash and are they really any better off? I don't think so. Losing the #1 might hurt though
     
  19. chuckd3534

    chuckd3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So now we want to trade for picks? Sounds good. I figure by the time Hank is 35 or so, and Girardi is 33 or so, and MSL is retired, and Staal is over 30 we'll be ready to roll.

    Let's go with that plan.
     
  20. chuckd3534

    chuckd3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    48
    We have top end forward talent now in Nash and MSL, we just need them to actually play like it...:), and even Kreider can score close to 30 next season. Now we need some higher end C talent and some size that can play on D and on the wing. That's the focus this summer IMO.
     

Share This Page