Did anyone think he'd take less than $30M/yr? This is a free agent signing we have to secure in the off season.
I have heard little. Is Max actually asking for 30 Mil? How many years and what figure is Max asking of the Tigers, or when he becomes a FA?
Sounds like he wants to be Verlander's equal, and no doubt he can be. Come to Daddy Max.... the evil dark empire is beckoning....(wait that's now Guggenheim and TWB-C). MoFo's, The games down under came and went, and DTV STILL is being blacked out of the fun and games...! I'm gonna Nuke those bastages, or blow an artery trying...!!!
...^^^ if that's true, he's a greedy idiot. If they offered a 5/6 year extension he'd be 36 at the end of the contract. How much does he hope to get next year, and how much f'n money is enough? ...He had a career year last year and may not be nearly as good this year, plus there's always the possibility of injury...he's taking a big gamble IMO.
I did not know that....not that it makes any difference does it? David Bowie, Mila Kunis have it as well, both I believe from childhood accidents...tho' what about Max, how did he get the Husky look? By birth or injury? no, obviously it doesn't matter. I've been going to many dog shows, seen to many Husky's, yep...!
A very Big Gamble, betting the House...hope he don't blow that arm/shoulder out....or he will be counting pennies.
Going into last season he had a career mark of 52-42 & was given a 3M dollar raise after a good season. Last season was a career year & he was given a 9M dollar raise to 15M. And That's! not enough. Just ANOTHER greedy bastard. Yeah I'm with Messiah, I hope his arm falls off.
Amen...Me 3...!!! The greedy fokker wants his salary doubled. He is NO Kershaw either. Hell, honestly I don't think any ballplayer is worth 30 mil. But I said that with A-Roids 25 mill too....WTF...!!!
59...I want this guy in pinstripes more than I wanted Cliff Lee. I could care less about the money. Phelps and Nuno don't replace an aging CC and retired Kuroda.
...I didn't say anything about not wanting him in pinstripes, and I did say anything about how much money he will get. I said "he's a greedy idiot" for turning down the Tigers' offer if it was for "$24 Mil at 5-6 years".
Yes, he gambled, no he's not greedy. The "greedy" tag is a little silly when talking about professional athletes. Baseball is a multi-billion dollar proposition, payroll is ownership's biggest expense. The players have a very limited window where they can command what the market deems their worth. These players have an obligation to fetch that when they can. If Scherzer can replicate the success of last season, there's no reason to believe he can't make Kershaw money. Scherzer netting a five year deal at the end of the season ends any mystery as to his intentions in this offseason. As for whether or not the Yanks pick him up, who comes off the books to make this work within the framework of the luxury tax? I know the Ghost of the Captain will go, but who else is up?
...nothing silly about it...if you admit he's taking a gamble that means he's obviously holding out for more money. Hence "greed".
IF & only IF he can duplicate it, then you discuss the multi year contract. But to demand that kind of money after ONE career season. Please, greedy IS the right word.
It's not. Greedy isn't the word for a man who has exactly one more year to command blockbuster money. And yes, if he plays as capably as last season he'll get Kershaw money. Barring catastrophic injury, even if he regresses slightly to considerably, he'll get paid what the Tigers offered him this season or slightly more on the open market. He gets to legitimately ask for this kind of money one more time, this is it, wring every dollar out of this opportunity, it's not coming again for a mid-30's front line starter. Greedy isn't the right word, but petty is a great word for the Tigers organization. Releasing a presser calling your 29-year old stud of a frontline starter greedy is the tactic of a bygone era and does nothing but engenders bad blood.
" wring every dollar out of this opportunity " = greed http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greed
When a city is in Detroits current fiscal state is and a man rejects that money and time while people who perform essential human services are probably wondering how much longer they'll have jobs it certainly does qualify as greed. The Tiger fans supported that team even though their city is in a low mode operation, drew what 3 mil plus. If I were a Detroiter I'd not pay a nickel to watch Scherzer on the days he pitches. Generally I don't begrudge salaries, as Tony Bennett once sang "Nice Work If You Can Get It" but in the Motown Situation Greed certainly applies.