Lamarcus Aldridge probably WILL NOT sign extension with Portland.

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Strenuus, May 15, 2014.

  1. RoyToy

    RoyToy Clown Town

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    10,977
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Greed.
     
  2. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    5,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    Trade him for Melo!!1!
     
  3. Kaydow

    Kaydow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Construction Sales
    Location:
    Happy Valley
    Lol. LA hasn't even said he won't sign extension. This is just speculation on the part of Marc Stein (and Feldman).
     
  4. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,976
    Likes Received:
    17,185
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    This thread is garbage.
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    This.
     
  6. BigGameDamian

    BigGameDamian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    33,031
    Likes Received:
    13,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [video=youtube;MIbOkmeAoH0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIbOkmeAoH0[/video]
     
  7. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LaMarcus and Carmelo are pretty similar players in that they live a lot by the mid range jumper. Carmelo is thought of as a volume shooter, but he's actually much more efficient than LA, he not only shoots a higher percentage from 2pt range, but his 40% 3pt shot puts him well over LMA.

    And neither are really defensive presences.
     
  8. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    You know why they need to get rid of Lamarcus. Too many fade aways!
     
  9. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like PFs in the Buck Williams mold. LaMarcus is very over-rated by posters here, just look at his shooting percentage. He has great games every once in awhile, but overall he's just not that good. He's tall, and has a shot he can get off anytime he wants to, so the Blazers force feed him that shot and he scores based on that volume of shots. All other facets of his game are mediocre at best.
     
  10. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    What are you talking about, he's one of the best forwards in the game. The problem is he's more a tweener than a power forward. He gets his points on mid range jumpers and fadeaways rather than inside and his rebounding/defense suffer as well. It is a big hole other teams take advantage off. Look at what the Spurs were able to do with that tool Splitter. He needs to pull his weight inside.
     
  11. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    5,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    Lol, did anyone see what Screamin' A. Smith said about LMA?

    http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1321849

    I linked to a Realgm page talking about it because i don't think he needs our views, and the idea of getting back anything on the Knicks without at least getting Melo for him is completely insulting, even if you did just make it up.
     
  12. blue9

    blue9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Messages:
    10,729
    Likes Received:
    7,169
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THANK YOU!
     
  13. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I can't even fathom a trade with New York that doesn't involve Melo.
     
  14. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    5,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    Come on, it's New York! We should consider ourselves lucky to get Failton back!
     
  15. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,777
    Likes Received:
    27,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm still all about trading LA, but the Knicks have nothing
     
  16. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nor can I fathom one that does. I can't magine trading the best player on a team that won 54 games and made it to the second round in the Western Conference for the best player on a team that won 37 games and missed the playoffs in the East.

    Melo is an offense killing black hole. He's had a USG% >30 for nine seasons is a row. He has the 5th highest career USG% in the entire history of the NBA. Does anyone, well other than Melo, REALLY think Carmelo Anthony is one of the 5 best players in the history of the league? He jacks up shots like he thinks he is. People who like Carmelo Anthony are impressed by his scoring average, but don't understand how his selfish play hurts his team. No thanks, I don't want to EVER see this guy in a Blazers uniform.

    BNM
     
  17. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    93,976
    Likes Received:
    57,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    That wasn't my point.
     
  18. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Kevin Durant's career USG% is 30.5 for 7 seasons. His 33% led the league this season.

    Good enough to be MVP.

    Anthony was top 15 in the MVP voting, which is probably right. He may be the 3rd best offensive player in the game, behind LeBron and Durant.
     
  19. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    You trade him if the right deal comes along but it wont be for draft picks and a budding asset.
    I think we will end up keeping LA at 5 years around 110m.

    Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
     
  20. Boob-No-More

    Boob-No-More Why you no hire big man coach?

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,094
    Likes Received:
    22,763
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes he did. He averaged 32.0 ppg on 33.0 USG% with .503 FG%, a TS% of .635 and a PER = 29.8. Those are definitely MVP numbers.

    Compare them to Anthony:

    27.4 ppg on 32.4 USG%, .452 FG%, .561 TS% and PER = 24.4. Anthony's numbers were significantly lower than Durant's in all cases EXCEPT USG%.

    Durant deserved his 33.0 USG%, Melo, not so much.


    If you only include scoring in your ranking of best offensive players, but if you include total offense and efficiency, I'd definitely rank Steph Curry and his 24.0 ppg/8.5 apg on .610 TS% and 28.3 USG% ahead of Anthony. As much as I hate his flopping, James Harden is also a more efficient scorer than Anthony. And, again if you consider total offensive game, not just scoring, I'd rank Chris Paul ahead of Anthony. Paul may have only averaged 19.1 ppg, but he's a more efficient scorer than Anthony and contributes 10.7 apg. Paul makes his teammates better, and therefore, has more of a positive impact on his team than Anthony does. Paul had a higher PER (25.9 vs. 24.4) than Anthony, but a MUCH lower USG% (23.7 vs. 32.4). There's more to offense than individual scoring.

    BNM
     

Share This Page