Hey Cap gurus

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Natebishop3, May 15, 2014.

  1. Harry's Raincoat

    Harry's Raincoat Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    620
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Again.....we have the MLE (about $7M) and the BAE (about $2M) to sign players. With or without MoWill.

    Best scenario: Mo stays and doesn't opt out. We can add two nice players to the team by cutting Watson and Claver.

    Good scenario: Mo opts out but stays for the BAE ($2M) but longer years (3). We then sign a nice player or two with MLE money, cut Watson and/or Claver.

    Bad scenario: Mo opts out and leaves, we cannot find a good replacement ball-handler, and bring back the same team as ended this year, don't improve much.
     
  2. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,044
    Likes Received:
    57,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    You forget the awesome scenario where Mo leaves and we replace him with someone better.
     
  3. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    13,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The MLE for next season is 5.305. The BAE will be at 2.077.

    We can sign Mo using the non-bird exception to a starting salary of 120% of his previous salary(2.652), so a starting salary of 3182400, , and can throw out a 3 year offer, 3/9,983,268. Round up and call it roughly a 3/10 deal. Maybe he gets more. But he'll be 32 in December. I dunno if the 3rd year(or potential 4th year) tacked on sways him to stay. Or whether we wat that ultimately. But you can offer him that without touching the BAE(2.077, only 2 years), and without touching the MLE. So you can sign Mo. Use full MLE on scorer, BAE on big?
     
  4. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Mini MLE since you're under the cap.
     
  5. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    13,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not far enough to matter, we'd have the normal, full MLE.
     
  6. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    Under the cap is under the cap.
     
  7. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    13,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd be more than happy to wager that you're absolutely wrong on this.
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    I think you're right. Mo opting out doesn't get you far enough under the cap. You cannot, however, use the $5M of salary space below the cap to sign players. The MLE buys maybe $1M more buying power, though. You could keep Mo AND have the MLE, which is the best of all worlds.
     
  9. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,451
    Likes Received:
    60,151
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    What "other" forum. I thought S2 was the ONLY forum we need!
     
  10. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If there is a midround draft prospect we like I could see Neil trading next years pick for him. The deal can be finalized right after the pick is made as then it won't matter we teaded away this years pick.

    Are there any teams in the middle of the draft who are trying to clear cap space? That could make a willing trade partner. We'd get a pick higher than our expected draft spot next year but gamble that we don't sink back into the lottery.
     
  11. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    13,095
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Chicago at 16 and 19?
     
  12. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    K.J. McDaniels. Like a young Gerald Wallace.
     
  13. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This team still needs to be in full on asset acquisition mode. That doesn't mean trading for cap space when that cap space is only a mill more than MLE and we then have 3 more spots to fill.
     
    illmatic99 likes this.
  14. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    Which of our bench players are owed guaranteed money next year?? I mean which ones can't we get rid of because of the money owed them.
     
  15. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All of them are guaranteed except Barton. Mo has a Player Option and Earl is a UFA.
     
  16. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.

    Oh God, all that money wasted on players who will never see anything but the bench.
     

Share This Page