can you show me a version where it doesn't have the ben gordan faded in the bg.. because that would be tight as hell if you did that. Also bring out the ben gordon text and the chicago bulls text is hard to read, bring that out. this has alotta potential in it. if you try my advice, I might just love it.(or actually you could just lower the opacity of the pic of ben gordon in the bg more)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KCX @ Nov 11 2006, 07:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>can you show me a version where it doesn't have the ben gordan faded in the bg.. because that would be tight as hell if you did that. Also bring out the ben gordon text and the chicago bulls text is hard to read, bring that out. this has alotta potential in it. if you try my advice, I might just love it.(or actually you could just lower the opacity of the pic of ben gordon in the bg more)</div>or lower the opacity of everything in the bg ALOT, except the Gordon pic. Then maybe the main pic will stand out more, and it'll look sick either way and it does have potential,
Not much difference, put little red gradient and lowered the opacity of the BG and made the text stand out.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (austingriz76 @ Nov 11 2006, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Not much difference, put little red gradient and lowered the opacity of the BG and made the text stand out.</div>I REALLY like this sig. Good work AG.
