All they found was the factory Reagan sold them. It was dismantled soon after War #I. All it has now is some chemicals all nations have, like sarin, but no delivery methods. Here is James Fallows homage to the 3-4 remaining defenders, which includes Denny, of Iraq War #2. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ll-faulkner-said-but-what-did-he-know/372887/
It's now the bias of the 99%. Let's count the legs left under your stool...Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz...sorry, Humpty.
Your article is about "blame Bush." He hasn't been president for 6 years, and Obama's had TWO Secretaries of state serve at his pleasure. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-critics-on-iraq-violence-bush-doctrine-was-right/ 36 percent of 310 million legs to that stool you think I stand on. Though you got my position wrong. I was in favor of taking out Saddam and nothing more. Like we did with Noriega.
I didn't include bloody-mouth warmonger Southerners as Americans, so you're still a dog with 3 legs. As for taking out Saddam and leaving, you have said that a few times before. But many more times, you have defended the long, long war.
Nope. I voted for Mike Badnarik, who would have brought the troops home in 2004. If you voted for Kerry, you voted to extend the war.
Your momentary symbolic vote doesn't compensate for your hundreds of posts defending the length of the war, including bragging about the Surge this week.
The surge only speaks to Obama's judgment. He said it would fail, and it succeeded. Where you get that I defend the length of the war or the occupation from that is between your ears and nowhere else.
Yeah right. All those threads, including this one, with you as the main player, defending every war action of the Bush era and critiquing Obama for not being warlike enough. Just imagining them.
We took Saddam out, bad dude, I have no problem with that mission. Should have done it with the first Gulf war. In either case, that's it, fne! Forget about making a democracy. Islam is a religion, a philosophy, and political game, democracy will not fit with Sharia. GW did not almost win, it was a predictable illusion that could only last until we were gone. Let it Burn. Prepare for what comes next and it will come after the Shia and the Sunni sort it out. Obama has got it nearly right this time except for a few dumb ass details. He should not send in 300 advisors without a force agreement giving them immunity from prosecution. And then define the mission, what are they to do, keep the Shia in the driver seat? Bull, he lacks the balls to do it right even when he might have it right. Damn! I think Obama and Hillary enabled this ISIS, arming them in Seria covertly, now he is send in advisors to Iraq to do what against these guys, armed with weapons partly provided by Obama? Can this guy actually be this dense?
Good conspiracy theory. But to be a great conspiracy theory, you need to insert a touch of paranoia. Like, maybe he's funding both sides in hopes of starting World War III in order to destroy the global power and telecommunications grid, so that his jack-booted thugs can then seize your guns and fluoridate your water during the blackout. barfo
He got the country wrong. jlprk's theory is the ambassador died in Libya while arming some faction there. And that makes the whole thing OK!
Here you go. What do you think? http://warontherocks.com/2014/04/is...-that-obama-has-started-arming-syrian-rebels/ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/06/hillary-clinton-arming-syrian-rebels-memoir http://rt.com/usa/obama-terrorist-arms-supply-966/ http://thehill.com/policy/international/210168-us-has-been-arming-isis-in-syria-sen-paul-claims
I think 0+0+0+0 = 0 unless, of course, the conspiracy is replacing your meaningful links with ones that say nothing... barfo
