Blazers offseason worse than the Rockets and Heat

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Draco, Aug 4, 2014.

  1. NewsSource

    NewsSource Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yep. Meyers is such a "key" that the Blazers spent the entire MLE to ensure he is even lower in the rotation than he was last year.
     
  2. NewsSource

    NewsSource Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also, Bert Kolde is always breathing over the shoulder of any Blazer GM.
     
  3. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,034
    Likes Received:
    57,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Is old Bert still hanging around?
     
  4. NewsSource

    NewsSource Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He's Paul Allen's version of the cicada. Except instead of appearing every 17 years, he shows up every 4 years to annoy everyone and make a mess of things, gets a coach or GM fired, then goes back into hibernation until things are looking up for the Blazers again.
     
  5. cmeese47

    cmeese47 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,889
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Repped
     
  6. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    THE SKINNY: I'm not being critical here; Portland didn't do anything really wrong. But the Blazers just didn't do much at all. Portland didn't delve too deeply into free agency, with a solid rotation, a lot of guaranteed contracts going forward for at least this coming season and a need to prepare for 2015, when Cousin LaMarcus will likely opt out and become a free agent. He's said he'll do so only to sign a bigger deal and wants to stay in Portland, but this coming season's results could certainly impact that decision. Blake replaces Williams as Lillard's backup, and Kaman comes in after struggling at Dallas and with the Lakers to stay in the regular rotation. He won't be starting here, which should help. The Blazers are also looking for internal improvement from the likes of second-year guards C.J. McCollum and Allen Crabbe, or third-year man Will Barton.

    I think that is dead on.

    I agree with the notion we really don't know the moves will play out until we see it in action. Kaman and Blake at their best will help Ptd greatly, at their worst will add nothing to Ptd and we will probably get something in between.

    I don't buy into the notion these were the only moves the Blazers could make. Olshey decided to keep the starting 5 together and not seek any big trade and didn't try to create cap room to go after free agents the way other teams did. Not saying it was the wrong decision, but Olshey decided not to break things up and only utilize MLE and BLE to help bolster the bench. Other teams show that you don't need cap space going into the summer to make a trade or go after free agents. Also I don't think Olshey really tried hard to keep Mo. Let's see how it all works out . . .
     
  7. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,204
    Likes Received:
    30,341
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    I don't think that Olshey tried to keep Mo at all. I think he helped him pack his bags, gave him a nice, "Thanks for the season and best of luck to you," and didn't think about him again all summer. Olshey made the decision to add a couple of journeymen to fortify the second unit. The intent was to put a couple of guys in there who would provide some stability and then let the young guys have the opportunity to provide some improvement. He clearly values the cap room that he can create next summer above trying to add the bits and pieces that he could have made a run at this summer with the limited resources he had available. The way I look at it, if the second unit can simply improve an average of say 2-3 points on offense and 2-3 points on defense, that will be enough to propel the Blazers into the upper echelon of the league. If it doesn't work, then Olshey has the opportunity to really shake things up next summer.
     
  8. The_Lillard_King

    The_Lillard_King Westside

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    12,405
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    There was one rumor that NO offered the same deal Blake got to Mo first and Mo declined. But I agree it didn't seem like the Blazers were real interested in keep Mo.

    I guess deciding not to keep Mo was my point. The feeling I was reading was the Blazers did all they could with what they had. I don't see it that way. GMs are creative and NO could have done more if he wanted to (like keeping Mo as one example or looking to make a trade or locking someone more high profile down for 4 yrs using the MLE). But NO has a plan and that plan was to not break up the starting 5, add to the bench using the MLE and BAE, and when Hawes didn't work out, keep flexibility for next year and having a roster that allows the young players time to develop. Might be a good plan (makes sense in my book, although didn't like Kaman for 5 million) . . . but we will see.

    But to say NO did the most he could with what he had, I don't think is accurate. He could do more, but decided that isn't the best route to take at this time.
     
  9. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,204
    Likes Received:
    30,341
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Some around here see Mo's departure as addition by subtraction. I'm not quite of that opinion, but I do think that Blake's 3-point shooting and more secure ball distribution will fit better with what Stotts is trying to do than Mo did. Hard to say what Kaman will do. I think that he has the talent to be a significant upgrade over Freeland or Leonard. His attitude is probably the most important thing. It seems like he kind of tends to shut down a bit when he doesn't like the way that a coach is using him...at least that's my read on his stints in LA and NO. He seems excited to be here and he has an established relationship with both Olshey and big man coach Kim Hughes, so I'm hopeful all of that carries over to a good year.
     
  10. Strenuus

    Strenuus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    50,493
    Likes Received:
    35,789
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Olshey looks at more subtle things than "OMG HAVE TO HAVE BEST PLAYER EVER! IF NOT YOU STUPID GM GET OUT!".

    and stuff.
     
  11. Draco

    Draco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,315
    Likes Received:
    3,004
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok thats fine to grade absolutely. But how can the Miami Heat while losing the best basketball player on the planet have absolutely gotten better than the Blazers who made basically no changes? Ridiculous!
     
  12. NewsSource

    NewsSource Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's luck, not an algorithm.
     
  13. blue32

    blue32 Who wants a mustache ride?

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    8,613
    Likes Received:
    2,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gee, there's a shocker.
     
  14. blue32

    blue32 Who wants a mustache ride?

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    8,613
    Likes Received:
    2,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That or no income tax, awesome beaches, night life, and a more famous franchise.
     
  15. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    19,992
    Likes Received:
    17,210
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    If the Blazers didn't do anything wrong then why the heck are they behind two teams with the biggest wrongs in the league this offseason. Makes zero sense to me.
     
  16. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,983
    Likes Received:
    5,839
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Haha... I can imagine Paul Allen holding old Bert in a cage until he sees something wrong and then he unleashes him "release the kraken" style.
     
  17. MadeFromDust

    MadeFromDust Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    540
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    I'm happy when I read things like this. This team thrives on being slighted and underestimated and there's been a ton of that this offseason already. People are saying our season was a fluke and discrediting our win over Houston.
     
    HailBlazers likes this.
  18. santeesioux

    santeesioux Just keep on scrolling by

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2008
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    5,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Trolling the internet
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    Signing Kaman and Blankey didn't do much for me either, but it has to be better than losing your only decent bench players and only getting d league players and guys that have been out of the league for years and losing the best player in the league.
     

Share This Page