I think its a good tradelakers getj.onealj.tinsleys.jacksongrangerindiana getsk.brownvladvujacicmickiebynumsalary has to work
Rofl, that's a terrible trade. Indy gives up 4 starters(one being an all star) for some role players at best? Nope. Not unless Indy desperately wants to ditch salaries and attitudes.
:cry2: Bynum...But Jermaine O'Neal would be sweet on our team. I don't know about this... I would think this over because it is a pretty big trade.
That would still be an awful trade for Indy. You are giving up Bynum, but they are giving up Granger who they arent going to trade..EVER!
Why would a two team deal ever consist of nine players? That is bad for both teams and no one trades that many players in one deal.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pistonfan11 @ Nov 20 2006, 07:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why would a two team deal ever consist of nine players? That is bad for both teams and no one trades that many players in one deal.</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>1997February 17: Nets trade Shawn Bradley, Robert Pack, Ed O?Bannon and Khalid Reeves to Dallas for Jim Jackson, Chris Gatling, Sam Cassell, Eric Montross and George McCloud.</div>Just to prove you wrong..... but the deal is terrible for the Pacers. http://www.nba.com/nets/history/trade_history.htmlThe Link^
I am just saying I think it is stupid. Especially considering the Pacers trade away four starters and get one.
terrible trade, indy is giving up most of there starting lineup, thats a lot of money for the lakers to take on
