ESPN Irony on NFL and Simmons

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by BrianFromWA, Sep 25, 2014.

  1. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry if it's been posted somewhere, but I found this to be a bit ironic today.

    I know many in here hate Simmons, and more are probably indifferent. I've liked reading him since 1998. I disagree with some of his takes, his homerism can be off the charts and he spends more time on pop culture than I like; but I love the premise and execution of Grantland and his role in the 30-for-30s.

    He was suspended again for calling out Goodell and the NFL head shed with some measured profanity, which I figured was coming soon. But less than 6 hours after I read about Simmons, I read this from ESPN's ombudsman:


    and then the tagline:
    Six of those finest hours later, Simmons was on a 3-week timeout and unable to "make it his". I just thought it was, well, ironic. Like a 10,000-spoons-when-all-you-need-is-a-knife thing.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2014
  2. julius

    julius I wonder if there's beer on the sun Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    44,409
    Likes Received:
    32,711
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Vagabond
    Location:
    Water Valley, Alberta Ca
    Is it like rain on your wedding day? or a free ride, when you've already paid?

    Thank you India!

    (smart ass aside, it is strange how he got suspended longer than the initial penalty that Rice faced. Even though it's different companies, it's rather interesting how words were worse than physical violence)
     
  3. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the record, a transcript of his quotes. I can't say I disagree with any of it.
    He went on to challenge ESPN:

    ESPN called. Seems that John Skipper, President of ESPN, has spoken.
     
  4. JFizzleRaider

    JFizzleRaider Yeast Lords Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    13,454
    Likes Received:
    6,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Who Knows?
    Love Simmons.

    Stephen a smith has really come around for me too. Dude speaks his mind and doesn't care.

    Espn needs more people like those two.
     
  5. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,820
    Likes Received:
    122,810
    Trophy Points:
    115
    1. It's fucking great to have Brian back!

    2. This smacks of Goodel calling up ESPN threatening to never give them another NFL TV contract unless they make the bad man stop saying mean things about him.
     
  6. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    Simmons is entertaining and I love his podcast. This sounds like someone in the NFL heard this podcast got PISSED and threatened ESPN so they acted.
    Simmons got a longer ban then Rices initial ban for doing nothing but calling Goodel out.
     
  7. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    I've never found Simmons particularly funny, so when he tries to be "on," I find him unreadable. When he writes semi-seriously, he's a pretty decent read. And I agree that he's built some great stuff when it comes to Grantland and the 30 For 30 franchise.

    I assume ESPN suspended him mostly because they don't want their columnists to sound like ranting bloggers, which I can understand. Still, three weeks seems excessive and it certainly looks bad, image-wise, considering what he was blasting and how correct he seems.
     
  8. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    Id have no qualm if Simmons wrote what he said in an artical that was posted or was said in a national broadcast and he got suspended but Simmons was suspended for a rant on a podcast thats all about gambling and he does it with a comedian writer.
    Its a three week suspension as well. That seems awfully long almost a "this is your last chance" type of suspension.
     
  9. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,365
    Likes Received:
    12,483
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never listen to Simmons' podcasts or really read his articles any more, because, well, I have better things to do. So am curious, does he always swear a lot in his podcasts? I see people bashing ESPn on twitter, saying he's suspended for calling out the NFL, when I imagine it has more to do with him yelling that it'sfucking bullshit. Again, don't know, never listen to his podcasts. But I imagine ESPn would suspend any employee for yelling about something being fucking bullshit, regardless of what it was he was saying.
     
  10. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, that's pretty normal. And in the podcast, it wasn't like he was on a Screamin' A rant or something.

    Simmons (and ESPN) have been very clear in the past that the podcast is something a bit different than "standard" ESPN fare. He's always had leeway with swearing, calling people out, talking about gambling, etc. That's one of the (many) reasons people think this smells. If he'd never been allowed to drop an f-bomb and got suspended for it, I'd understand it. Wouldn't agree, but whatever--rules are rules. That wasn't the case here. It seems to wholly reside in his content, and especially in his use of the "L"-word. His last two mailbags and articles have blasted Goodell (especially his post-press conference one) with profanity. It's not like this was out of left field.
     
  11. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    I think it has to do with saying Goodell lied. Some times he said "I think" which allows him to give his opinion, but sometimes Simmons just said Goodell lied. That leaves Simmons and ESPN open to lawsuits.
     
  12. maxiep

    maxiep RIP Dr. Jack

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,291
    Likes Received:
    5,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Merchant Banker
    Location:
    Denver, CO & Lake Oswego, OR
    What stands out to me is that the ESPN Ombudsman declares the Ray Rice story "the biggest story in sports". Note to ESPN: It's not sports. It's domestic violence. It's assault. The accused happens to have played pro football. That doesn't make it sports.

    ESPN needs to keep its eye on the ball. It's about sports. Leave the Ray Rice story to actual news outlets.
     

Share This Page