What to address in summer?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Schilly, Nov 7, 2014.

  1. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obviously feeling a bit of a high after last nights game, but my feeling even before camp was that I'm not sure what the team should be addressing in the summer aside from just keeping their starters.

    Defense has been a concern.... but if you look at the pattern, in Stott's 1st season they ranked 29th in defense, last season 16th, so far this season 3rd.

    Bench has been a concern... But with the addition of Kaman and Blake and the (so far) perceived progression of CJ and Robinson, Bench is looking solid.

    From my perspective we need to keep the 5 starters and then re-sign Robinson. We will have another MLE type slot to use on a free agent as well as a 1st rounder. Our weakest position depth wise is the SF Who could we target either in the draft (too early to know really, but suggestions appreciated!) or as a MLE signing?

    Or.... How do you perceive it?
     
  2. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wish we could get better at the backup 3 but there really aren't many obtainable good backup 3s this coming summer. We're looking at guys like Aminu, Daye, Fields (what happened to him?!?), Gee, Gerald Green (only good option), Xavier Henry, Wesley Johnson... Other than that it's old dudes and RFA's,
     
  3. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What about Singler or Dunleavy?
     
  4. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dunleavy would be decent but is gonna be like 35 I think... Singler is an RFA.
     
  5. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everything I see has Singler as a UFA as he was a 2nd rounder who went to europe then signed using their MLE.
     
  6. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bird Rights and Restricted aren't the same thing.
     
  8. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, lol I always thought they were similar or the same.
     
  9. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Restricted means that the team has the right to match any offer a player receives, and keep the player. The player has no say in it.

    Bird Rights simply mean that a team can exceed the salary cap to re-sign the player. If the player chooses to sign elsewhere the team can't do anything to prevent it.
     
  10. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    We should have this discussion mid season. We may not even have to change a damn thing. If we can bring back Kaman, Blake and have our current players (CJ, Robinson, Will, and Leonard maybe) maybe enough.

    These young guys can and will get better.

    I can see Wright, Claver and Freeland either moved or just allowed to leave.
     
    PDXFonz likes this.
  11. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's never too soon!! Mid season is when these decisions would need to be addressed more than likely anyway due to the trade deadline.
     
  12. Wizard Mentor

    Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    14,371
    Likes Received:
    14,449
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Master of Xen Foro
    Location:
    La Grande, OR
    MORE FACETIME FOR THE HCP!
     
  13. GriLtCheeZ

    GriLtCheeZ "Well, I'm not lookin' for trouble."

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gleaming the Cubicle
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    I know there is a lot of uncertainty with our roster, but it really is too early for these types of threads, because these questions are unanswerable at this point in the season. The blazers still have to assess where the young players are at leading up to the trade deadline, and then where they are at at the end of the season. The blazers might even trade their first pick for for a SF/sixth man at the deadline completely invalidating this whole thread. Who the hell knows at this point :)
     
  14. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think that invalidates the thread at all. As I mentioned we have a depth issue at SF... We don't really have a young SF, unless Crabbe steps up. Claver isn't it.
     
  15. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hope we move those three... Maybe we could do that and get Gerald Henderson, he isn't being used in Charlotte.
     
  16. GriLtCheeZ

    GriLtCheeZ "Well, I'm not lookin' for trouble."

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    2,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Gleaming the Cubicle
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Can't wait for game 6! :devilwink:
     
  17. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,592
    Likes Received:
    56,024
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I don't understand the need to fill specific positions (like SF) for the bench. I think it would be smarter to address the roles that need to be filled.

    We have a facilitator (Blake), an inside threat (Kaman), an energy big (TRob), and a shooter (CJ). Seems solid enough for me. Wing defense on the bench might be a hole, but realistically, how many mins will Nic or Wes not be on the floor?

    I don't see specifically targeting a backup SF to play 10-15 mpg being be a priority. General improvement of talent on the bench-- absolutely! But this should be done regardless of position.
     
  18. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,281
    Likes Received:
    26,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Someone who can create their own shot would be a huge addition
     
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My thoughts exactly. Preferably that person would also be able to attack and finish at the rim, as well.
     
  20. BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94

    BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 AWOL

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    21,056
    Likes Received:
    10,366
    Trophy Points:
    113
    CJ is probably that guy, problem is when you have bench players that can create they usually become ball hogs (cough* Mo/Jamal Cough*) and inefficient.
     

Share This Page