in all fairness, KS should get some kudos for broaching the subject before hollinger weighed in. he scooped the groupthink, so to speak
KingSpeed is the Adrian Wojnarowski of S2! Or, maybe since Eric is more famous, that should be: Adrian Wojnarowski is the KingSpeed of Yahoo Sports! BNM
14 games, 11-3. There, topic addressed and the reason the playoff odds mean nothing to me at this point. Of course the reason I didn't address the playoff odds originally was because they didn't exist when this thread was started.
I'm not trying to argue with you, but why were you using the SOS last season to give proof that Blazers aren't playoff contenders?
The interesting thing to me about using SOS is that, IMO: If a team's SOS is shit, and they are losing those games, it seems reasonable to conclude the team is shit. Conversely, if a team's SOS is shit, and they are winning those games, I don't think it "proves" anything, even if the winning margins are slim. Meanwhile, if the team's SOS is high, and they are winning those games, it's fair to conclude the team is probably pretty good. Hmm, which of those describes my beloved Blazers?
Well let's see.....with losses to the Mavs, Knicks and Kings, the Rockets are flailing......er wait, you mean they beat those teams? without 3 of their starters? But Eric called it like he saw it?
Oh shit, now I understand what last night was about. I hadn't been reading this thread. I had no idea that MM was upset with Kingspeed. I would like to apologize to Mediocre Man because I thought he was in a good mood and just playing around last night. I didn't realize that MM was in the midst of a complete meltdown. Why doesn't someone clue me in when this happens?!? Now off to edit some insults from some posts...
Is it fair to ask if the Rockets are actually better than the Blazers? Same record, but they beat Memphis and we lost to Memphis? Does this mean the Blazers are in danger of missing the playoffs? I mean we all know the Rockets, missing 3 starters with a 14-4 record arent gonna make it.