Are you happy?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Further, Dec 4, 2014.

  1. fumanchu

    fumanchu Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I agree with what you're saying here for the most part, and I think the league has done a better job of cleaning up the star call/big market officiating bias since the Tim Donahue scandal. Most the bad calls even out in the end. Usually the refs will give a team a make-up call if they knew they screwed up (it happened to Dame the other night).

    That said, in the case of the Golden State game earlier this year, that game was stolen from us. With a few seconds left we had the lead and the ball was knocked out of bounds. The call on the floor was Blazer ball. They reviewed it for about 10 minutes and none of the angles showed "conclusive" evidence that it went off the Blazers, yet they still overturned the call on the court and gave it to Golden State. Thompson hits a three for the lead, we fumbled the last possession, game over. Yeah you could say we still had a shot but it shouldn't have come to that. We were robbed by the refs flat out. It still baffles me why they overturned the call on the court. We should be 16-3 right now and leading the west.
     
  2. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    29,158
    Likes Received:
    9,836
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
  3. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
  4. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    I like the won-lost profiles. It says we're 6-2 vs "good" opponents. Compare that to 2-1 for GS, 2-2 for HOU, 4-1 for MEM, 2-1 for DAL, 2-1 for LAC, and 3-3 for PHX.

    Only current western playoff team with a better record is SAS at 6-1.

    I don't completely understand how 82 games does these rankings, but I'm guessing our 2 losses to good teams have been GS and MEM.

    Surprised we've already played 8 games vs "good" teams. Wonder who they are, because we have two losses vs "average" teams as well. I thought those two were SAC and LAC.
     
  5. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Actually... nvm. I got it. Table is unnecessarily complicated.
     
  6. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,643
    Likes Received:
    20,336
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    I'm just shocked (and relieved) nobody posted that annoying 'happy' song.
     
  7. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    http://www.82games.com/1415/1415POR5.HTM

    According to the data on 82games, our work is at PG and SF, but hardly enough for a concern. We are very dominant at SG and PF. We are above average at the center position.

    The SG position probably has a boost because Lillard plays SG when blake is in with him. Whatever the case, we are a damn good team!

    We should be happy!
     
  8. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
  9. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
  10. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,096
    Likes Received:
    9,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting...82 games has our PG PER at 15.6. Dame's is 22.4 and Blakes is at 9.7, so I guess they're saying that Blake plays almost exactly half the game at PG (when he's averaging 22.2mpg). That means that about 8-10 mpg of Dame counts at SG, which (combined with Wes's 16.5) is probably why SG is "dominant". And SF is low b/c both Nic and Crabbe have well-below-average PERs (12.7 and 9.5), but I don't think there's a ton that we're complaining about (other than Nic's shot being eligible to join the Bricklayer's Union).
     
  11. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Yeah I was seeing it the same way.

    I truly believe Batum will turn things around and that deficiency at SF will won't be much of a factor. We've been holding their SFs to a 12.7 PER, which is pretty damn good, especially since we've played some pretty SF dominant teams
     

Share This Page