http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writ...art1/index.html I think this guy is completely off and I will go into more detail tonight. :beee:
I don't agree with him putting Reggie Bush so far down. That guy is class. If you don't think he's going to be better in coming years, then uh, wow.
-Matt lienart at 4 was a good pick. -Also vince young at #3. The texans should have taken vince Young, hes a texas hero. oh yeah hes also a winner. A big winner. hes like Mike Vick, if mike vick was good and gave a crap. I'd put him at #1. - a kicker at 18 makes a lot of sense.(sarcastic)- I agree with brewcitybuck
This guys on drugs, I agree with Leinart and Young going in teh top 5, but Bush shoudl also be up there, I mean after the way he played last sunday he showed that he was defenetly a force to be reckoned with
Don Banks is retarded.The Broncos would pick a running back because? Because Tatum Bell and his 87 rushing ypg have been terrible, right? Because they're the 4th best rushing team in the league, right?Mike Bell has been great too. Good idea you f*cking idiot Banks.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Something-To-Say @ Dec 5 2006, 08:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If you still read SI thinking any article from there will be good, then you need help.</div>good point, I havent seen anything worth reading theer in a while. Other than teh swimsuit issue if you know what I mean :shifty2:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (tmgbball15 @ Dec 5 2006, 07:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>good point, I havent seen anything worth reading theer in a while. Other than teh swimsuit issue if you know what I mean :shifty2:</div>I don't know what you're saying...Do you mean the quality of literature contained within the covers of that edition of that magazine happens to be of higher educational quality?
