Yeah, I don't get the classification as "Old". But it's nice to see that the Blazers are one of only 3 teams that have both top 10 offensive and defensive efficiency.
I think it's just a simple "are you above or below the league median age?"... which is 26.9. We are 27.1 years old. Golden State is 26.5 years old.
I guess that's logical if you think that Steve Blake and Chris Kaman are part of the Blazers' long term future. But other than those guys, the Blazers have nobody on their roster over 29. The Warriors have four guys over 30. No biggie, but kind of funny given the number of players on rookie contracts that we have.
Totally, but this is just data visualization; in the end, you're just looking at data. Of course, we have like nobody on contract in a couple years so should we even be on the list?
That should be weighted by minutes played. Wright Kaman Blake Freeland bring our age way up but dont start.
If we trade T-Rob and Barton for Chandler, and then pick up Prince, we will have gone from "old" to "Jlprk".