<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ballerman2112 @ Jan 3 2007, 05:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The Wolves were 1-2 when they had Cassel, and they were 1-2 and when they didnt have him. There was no real difference what so ever....Just like when the Sonics played against the Spurs in the playoffs a couple years ago. They did just as good without Vladimir Radmonivic and Rashard Lewis.</div>Just because Cassell played does not mean he was nearly 100%. Fact is, Cassell was injured the entire series, and probably hurt the team by playing the first three games.Here's how I see it as a biased Wolves fan-Scoring- KGPassing- KGRebounding- EvenDefense- KG
KG, who else can say they lead there team all-time in points, assists, rebounds, blocks, and steals I thinkTalk to me in 3 more years, then this could be interesting
right now, kg. but if I were to build a franchise off a player, id choose dwight. hes got some great years in his future, and I dont think kevins gonna stay at this kind of level for many more seasons. both are great players
Kevin Garnett 30 games 38.6 mins 22.2ppg, 12.4rpg, 4.3apg, 1.2spg, 1.8bpg, 26 double-doublesDwight Howard 33 games 36.0 mins 16.8ppg, 12.5rpg, 1.8apg, .8spg, 1.9bpg, 24double-doublesNot close. KG by a mile on this one. Maybe 4 or 5 years from now KG would retire from the game and still be the better player of the two. Howard still needs to drink his milk in order for him to be named into the elite guys like KG, Timmy, Dirk and Brand.
