Re: Ranking the NBA's top 10 PG's. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BALLAHOLLIC? @ Dec 19 2006, 11:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Wow, Some of these lists are horrible. Jason Terry and TJ Ford over Gilbert Arenas? Allen Iverson is getting snubbed also. How do you go against a guy averaging 31 and 7? Please explain to me why he isn't number 1 or 2 on your list.</div>As was said earlier, I think some of us don't really count Iverson as a point guard. He started most of his games this year at the 2, and has played the 2 spot most in his career. So I count him in with Bryant, Wade, and the other two guards in this league. I definately think he's a better basketball player than every point guard on this list.
Re: Ranking the NBA's top 10 PG's. 1. Steve Nash2. Jason Kidd3. Chauncey Billups4. Chris Paul5. Gilbert Arenas6. Baron Davis7. Deron Williams8. Andre Miller9. Tony Parker10.Mike BibbyCassell would be in there but, due to livingston and age/injury problems he is not.
Re: Ranking the NBA's top 10 PG's. I changed mine...I just realized that my first list was absolutely terrible.
Re: Ranking the NBA's top 10 PG's. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (valo35 @ Dec 19 2006, 10:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think having TJ Ford at seven on your list above Arenas, Parker, and Davis is ludicrous. He is a talented young point guard, but I don't think he is above any of the three of them.</div>Arenas loses some because of how different he's been on the road this season. There's a huge divide there between his effectiveness at home and when he's on the road. Davis is only on the list for skill, but BARELY because he's a tumor on any team. Parker's good, but I just feel Ford is a LITTLE better. You think SA would be hurting if they had Ford instead of Parker?
Re: Ranking the NBA's top 10 PG's. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (falconman1130 @ Dec 20 2006, 03:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Arenas loses some because of how different he's been on the road this season. There's a huge divide there between his effectiveness at home and when he's on the road. Davis is only on the list for skill, but BARELY because he's a tumor on any team. Parker's good, but I just feel Ford is a LITTLE better. You think SA would be hurting if they had Ford instead of Parker?</div>I think they would be worse if Ford was their starting point guard over Parker. Parker isn't the best at defense, but he's ten times better on the defensive end of things as Ford is. Ford looks like he is a better passer, because he gets to hold the ball longer than Parker does. Parker is among the best passers in the league, but he is in an offense where you don't get to see it because Parker has to pass the ball and iniate the offense as opposed to getting to hold the ball like Ford. Parker is also a better scorer than Ford is, can get to the rim just as well, and has a better mid range shot. I fail to see where Ford is just a "little" better, Parker is MUCH better than Ford is.You say Davis is a tumor on any team he gets on, he went to the playoffs every year he was with the Hornets for the entire season, and is the driving factor on the Golden State team that is going to be in playoff contention in the West. He was never a huge problem on the Hornets, he just had some injury problems while he was there. To say he is a cancer is completely wrong.That Arenas thing is weak. Even if he doesn't play as well on the road, as he does at home, he is stilll better on the road than Ford is on the road or at home. He is seriously, a much better player and point guard than Ford is at any location.
