Bill would require gun owners to have liability insurance or pay $10,000 fine

Imagine that! Another Democrat ignoring the Constitution or even overtly attempting to circumvent the protections citizens have under the Constitution.

 

would you rather driving cars without liscensing and insurance pretty sure the insurance lobby is behind the driving one , not blasfemours of the constitution

 

If I could convince people they were morons this issue would be easier to discuss.

If you believe the constitution grants the right to own guns and you think this is acceptable you are an idiot.

Let's skip all that and talk about this moron equating mandatory insurance with lower fatalities. Modern vehicle safety might just have a SMIDGE to do with it.

 

I don't know why you would even ask this question. I see nothing in the Constitution that would restrict States from requiring people to buy car insurance. So to that extent, the 10th amendment
pretty much grants Constitutional authority to the States to do it. I can seen no parallel between a car and a gun.

 

Golly, I can sure see why licenses and insurance requirement can be considered an infringement of a right.

 

Mr. Jefferson was spot on in my view when he told us that our rights come from the creator. When we understand this, then we also understand that no man has the authority to deprive us of our rights. The second amendment to the Constitution is rather straight forward reinforcement of the same concept, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. This concept has been acknowledge as a right of men for much longer than our country has existed and is discussed in the Law of Nations. It makes no sense that thinking men would ever give up their rights for any reason. If a man is deprived the means to defend himself and his people, he has nothing.

 

90% of the active political gun confiscation lobby is made up of women.

The other 10% are of indeterminate sex.

0% of them can accurately quote The Second Amendment, the same number understand it's meaning and purpose.

But 99% of the funding for gun confiscation bills comes from the 1% crowd. Bloomberg alone has spent upwards of $4 billion to disarm the poorer masses.

 

Yeah, because ya know: that insurance card in my glove compartment helped me to avoid that tree.

Cock sucking cow. Figures only some hag from NEW YORK would introduce shit like this.

I own 6 guns, and if you think I'm insuring even ONE of them, you are fucking retarded.

 

Where do I get one of these cows?

Insurance is not meant to prevent anything, it just helps with the clean up.

 

That's not what they're looking for though. They want to add more red tape to dissuade people from buying guns. The object is to circumvent the 2nd amendment. "Sure, they're legal, but you have to pay a bunch of money every month."

 

Gun laws in America are not "legal".

Their very existence is absolutely 100% forbidden by The Second Amendment to The United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the The United States of America, and anyone promoting gun laws or attempting to enforce them on Real Americans is committing treason. The penalties for treason reflect the severity of the crimes.

 

Not if you're rich, like the people writing the bills and enacting them without our votes. They'll always have their guns. Their goal is to disarm the masses, whose right to bear will most certainly be infringed by cost. Their goal is to disarm the very people who put them in office, the poor, the minorities, the people they claim to represent.

 

Geez! It is kind of embarrassing that you need to point the fact out.