Haywood and Mike Miller to Portland

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Red Rooster, Jul 26, 2015.

  1. Blazinaway

    Blazinaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,525
    Likes Received:
    3,841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no kidding, what is wrong with some of these guys here?
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,111
    Likes Received:
    40,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Miller's salary just ate into the gap between our team salary and the salary floor--money that wll be paid out to our guys at season's end if not used--so this trade basically just took $200K out of each of our players' pockets. Someone's going to point that out to them, and they'll all rebel against Olshey, refuse to take the floor for the first game of the season, Olshey will be fired, and Paul Allen will move the team.

    Is all that worthy of a couple second round picks? :smiley-195517897341
     
  3. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And we still have more to absorb than they do. We gave up zero assets, zero flexibility. All we have up was some cash. They can't combine their trade exceptions with each other or with other players, we don't need trade exceptions. There is absolutely zero harm done to the Blazers here. We gained 2 future 2nd rounders. In the past Neil has turned those into Robinson, Lopez and Harkless... All of whom have more actual value than a 2nd round pick.

    I swear if Neil were walking down the street and found a $5 Bill people would complain he didn't do a good enough job because he didn't find a $20.
     
  4. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    18,256
    Likes Received:
    23,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, folks - can bring myself to read 9 pages, but from what I understand, essentially the Blazers purchased 2 second rounders for cash?

    The players were just sort of intermediaries.

    Low risk, at worst low reward, at best find a Ginobili, Cliffy, Kersey, Duckworth, Rodman, Boozer....
     
  5. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,331
    Likes Received:
    19,819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Selfless Public Servant
    Location:
    South Blazerlandia
    Just because the other team got a bigger benefit from the trade than the Blazers did, doesn't mean it wasn't a good deal for the Blazers. Did the Blazers get more value than they sent out? If yes, then it was a good trade for us. Fans clamour for Paul Allen to use his wealth to outbid other teams, then complain when he does that Olshey took a "worse" deal than other teams would have? Some people just live to be negative.
     
  6. Schilly

    Schilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,161
    Likes Received:
    3,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Blazers have 2 more draft picks than they did 24 hours ago, using money they had to spend anyway. Total fail.
     
  7. Shooter

    Shooter Unanimously Great

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Occupation:
    advertising
    Location:
    Blazerville
    I'm not complaining about adding assets, but it seems to me that we didn't get a whole lot in return for doing Cleveland a huge favor.
     
    jlprk and oldmangrouch like this.
  8. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    Look past Cleveland for a minute. Who cares what benefit they got because they would have done it anyway with 2 other teams.
     
    0-Our! and PtldPlatypus like this.
  9. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,331
    Likes Received:
    19,819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Selfless Public Servant
    Location:
    South Blazerlandia
    Exactly the point of acquiring them. For Paul Allen's spare change.
     
  10. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,529
    Likes Received:
    114,550
    Trophy Points:
    115
    I have come up with 7 different scenarios on how we could trade for Lebron using the $23mill in cap space but can't create one that uses the $20 mill.

    It matters!
     
    0-Our!, dviss1 and magnifier661 like this.
  11. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    It's not even that. It's money they had to spend anyway. So it would have hit Allen's pocketbook regardless if this deal didn't happen.
     
  12. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    You could always use Mike Miller in the trade! ;)
     
    dviss1 and SlyPokerDog like this.
  13. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    21,084
    Likes Received:
    13,622
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As some of you have pointed out, we need 2nd round picks to make the lopsided trades we are all hoping for. We just didn't have enough left from other trades. So even though it is not an exciting trade, the only thing it cost was a few hours of Neil's time and some money from Paul Allen. (Money which has no effect on our cap) Thinking we could get a 1st round pick out of it is unrealistic. Cleveland would be stupid to do that. These picks IMO will be traded within the year.
     
  14. julius

    julius Global Moderator Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    42,492
    Likes Received:
    30,115
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    singer songwriter
    Location:
    Washington
    You do understand that they got 2 picks for doing nothing basically, right?

    Why do I suspect you'd complain if the Cavs did this trade with someone else, for the exact same picks included.
     
  15. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,331
    Likes Received:
    19,819
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Selfless Public Servant
    Location:
    South Blazerlandia
    Haha. Exactly. If Olshey didn't do this deal, and some other team did, it would be further evidence of Olshey's failure. LOL
     
  16. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    32,111
    Likes Received:
    40,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is exactly right. It's not just value that's important, it's also scarcity. Since others could provide what we could, the value that we would receive in return is less. Basic economics
     
  17. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    116,529
    Likes Received:
    114,550
    Trophy Points:
    115
    If you're not going to take this serious you just don't care about improving the team.
     
    magnifier661 likes this.
  18. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    17,619
    Likes Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's amazing to me how many people in here dislike John canzano, but then parrot his stupidity.
     
  19. magnifier661

    magnifier661 B-A-N-A-N-A-S!

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    59,328
    Likes Received:
    5,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Cracking fools in the skull
    Location:
    Lancaster, California
    And the other reality is Cleveland didn't even need to do it. They are already pretty stacked and most likely favorites to win it all. They could have easily dropped Haywood for nothing and traded Miller to some other team for 2nd rounders.
     
  20. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,060
    Likes Received:
    9,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that's his trade kicker, and they have to.
     

Share This Page