I guess not. I just assumed its a culture where women get raped... lol The fact that he denied 20% is wrong though. I know that
An immature and thoughtless "break down" deserves an immature and thoughtless response. Maybe if what you had written wasn't so fucking stupid it would have elicited a more thoughtful response. I'm having trouble reconciling your first post with this sentence you also wrote: For someone who has known many women who have been sexually assaulted it's shameful that you attempt to cast judgement on a woman/situation you don't know anything about.
If he had simply said, "Based on the information made available to date, her story seems to lack credibility," would you view that as similarly shameful?
You didn't even discern what I said. You didn't even have a response except for "it was stupid". Well that's a stupid response. Either engage in a polite conversation about it and leave your asshole attitude at the door and don't reply. I'm not sitting here calong her a good digger. I'm not sitting here calling her names. I'm not women bashing or anything of the like, so your rather volital response is puzzling, since all I did was breakdown what she said and why I thought it lacked credibility. All cases are different. Just because I believe one women is lying doesn't relate to any of the women I've known.
No. But even that response is unnecessary. Who cares if, to some anonymous internet poster, there's a seeming lack of credibility? There could very well be a whole lot more to the story that we're not privy to, so to comment as to guilt or innocence on something we have SO LITTLE information on is a little off-putting. But mainly it's the ignorant presumptions that have been made that are so disgusting.
Of course it's unnecessary. But then again, your statement could be applied to everything discussed on this board. Who cares if, to some anonymous internet poster, a basketball player takes too many long two-point jump shots? Our opinions on that are equally relevant as our opinions on this. That being said, where is the line of demarcation as to when it is acceptable for an anonymous internet board poster to comment on an unresolved case? How much information is enough? Is it only reasonable to comment after the case has been adjudicated?
I'm going based off what's been SAID. There might be more to the story and I reserve the right to change my opinion if more information becomes available. But based off what she reportedly, I think she's lying. And somehow that disgusts you? HAH. Wow.
Its more the speed at which it all happens (not like that). In modern times, girls just vanish into thin air and you never hear from them again even if you had the best date ever so you have to push for sex as quick as you can. That leads to girls being regretful for "slutting it up so quickly", just how it is nowadays.
I just find it very hard to believe that a man would want to gang rape his girlfriend... That's just my opinion though. Of course I could be wrong, but her going for money over locking him up says a lot.
