No , I could care less about him, do u even know the history behind cashman? Anyway the truth is what concerns me, that's all. Not my truth but THEE truth,
You actually couldn't care less. If you could care less then you.....nevermind. Anyway, I know the history of Cashman quite well. What those who bend over backwards to defend him don't want to admit is that for years he was able to use big money to cover up his numerous busts and mistakes. Now with some of the huge contracts closing out soon we're down to brass tacks. These youngsters have better pan out or this organization will be right back to dabbling in the big money free agent market.
Not defending him at all, my goodness! And instead of correcting another's grammar , open the mind! Cashman is a puppet on a string who did not know the difference between a Ping pong ball and a baseball before gettin job through his fathers friendship with the boss
The Boss isn't around anymore and you have two idiot sons who likely care more about the ATM machine they inherited than the on the field product. To try and claim Cashman holds no responsibility for the team that's put together or any moves that are made is completely ridiculous.
...why Cashman was given the job has nothing to do with why he still has the job. The Boss has been gone for a long time now. ...and as usual, you're talking out of your ass...Cashman did have some experience before being named GM. he was was assistant GM to Gene Michael for 6 years or so...and stop implying that Cash's Father got him the GM job because it simply is not true.
Lol, cashman got the job through the boss and still has it for 1 reason, the 2 idiots that own the team don't give a shite! Geez you say it yourselves and u still argue the fact.
...el oh f'n el...what a cartoon....Of course Cashman got the job through the Boss, no shit, but implying that it was because of Cashman's Father is idiotic...and now you finally admit Cashman is a/the problem.
...if you admit you can't "prove it", why did you say it?...If you make an assertion the onus is on you to back it up...do you have any clue at all?...or do you type anything that comes to mind?
'Why cashman was. Given the job has nothing to do with why he still has the job, ahhhh. Wow!! that goes along with your what does it matter what side of the bag the ball is thrown to in a non force issue! Please, the more you try to convince one of your intellect the more ignorant you sound, but whatever, that's you, now respond back with something from left field so your fictitious friend can piss its pants for the umpteen time today
...lmao...you can't even quote someone properly...read it again... s l o w l y this time. ...what I said was "why Cashman was given the job has nothing to do with why he still has the job. " (post # 90) ...and you have the gall to question someone else's "intellect"?...please don't try to use words you're obviously not familiar with. ...classic self pwnage...haven't you been abused enough already today?
