Wow insane game Delfino in OT1 hit the game tieing 3 pointer.2nd Overt time. Channing Frye hits a a jumpshot from the wing to tie the game. At the end he does BALLLIIINNNNNNN dance.Right now its 3rd OT Knicks are up 144-143
Great - another ref screws up a game winning / tying play.That was a VERY blatant foul on Rip. He got hit twice, and nothing.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pinoy Balla @ Dec 27 2006, 11:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Rip should have calmed down. But Channing Frye.BAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNN!</div>Actually it was more Jamal Crawford who was Ballin.He couldn't miss.
o sorry but rip left his tampon on the bench..............that was not a foul, if you're referring to the play that led to him getting T'ed up. frye tapped his wrist and balkman changed his shot. I'm not being bias at all either. that was not a foul and rip should've known better and shut up. that was NOT a foul.this was an up and down game the whole way. what a fun game to watch. the game should've never went to OT because jefferies should've fouled prince before he passed it to delfino. they had a foul to give. marbury is back, 41 points tonight and that 6th foul was bullsh**. hamilton just flopped and marbury happened to tap him. marbury looked great tonight and he was resilient hitting those clutch free throws after getting fouled behind the arc. curry was dominant inside again and actually hit his free throws. but about the game, every time you thought the knicks were out they fought back. I thought it was over when they were down 4 in 2 OT with 32 seconds left but crawford got a bucket and a foul then billups missed a free throw and frye sent it to 3 OT. pretty funny that billups was involved in all the critical plays down the stretch.....fouling marbury for three, missing the three to win the game, missing the free throw that led to a frye buzzer beater. go knicks!!!!!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nykfan4life @ Dec 28 2006, 12:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>o sorry but rip left his tampon on the bench..............that was not a foul, if you're referring to the play that led to him getting T'ed up. frye tapped his wrist and balkman changed his shot. I'm not being bias at all either. that was not a foul and rip should've known better and shut up. that was NOT a foul.this was an up and down game the whole way. what a fun game to watch. the game should've never went to OT because jefferies should've fouled prince before he passed it to delfino. they had a foul to give. marbury is back, 41 points tonight and that 6th foul was bullsh**. hamilton just flopped and marbury happened to tap him. marbury looked great tonight and he was resilient hitting those clutch free throws after getting fouled behind the arc. curry was dominant inside again and actually hit his free throws. but about the game, every time you thought the knicks were out they fought back. I thought it was over when they were down 4 in 2 OT with 32 seconds left but crawford got a bucket and a foul then billups missed a free throw and frye sent it to 3 OT. pretty funny that billups was involved in all the critical plays down the stretch.....fouling marbury for three, missing the three to win the game, missing the free throw that led to a frye buzzer beater. go knicks!!!!!</div>WOWok say you're right about the "tap" of Rip's wrist - well guess what that IS a foul. Put aside the BS and Rip got hit TWICE going to the basket and nothing! Please don't say you're not biased - because you obviously are the biggest Knicks homer on BBW. When the Pistons won yesterday against the Nets because of a no-call I admitted it - and believe me I am the biggest Piston fan on this forum - at least I am good enough for the honesty. btw - this title to the thread was a great foreshadowing to what actually happened. the Knicks bs the Pistons.
give me a break. even if it was a foul, like you claim, it's a tap on the wrist. the nba has too many pussy fouls called and that shouldn't have been called. hamilton got enough calls his way the whole game. where was the second foul? when balkman altered his shot by just being in the area? you want a call? go to the hole and draw a legit foul. what about when rip fell to the floor when marbury just touched him? that was not a foul. that also put marbury on the bench because he fouled out on that play. he had 41 points.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nykfan4life @ Dec 28 2006, 12:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>give me a break. even if it was a foul, like you claim, it's a tap on the wrist. the nba has too many pussy fouls called and that shouldn't have been called. hamilton got enough calls his way the whole game. where was the second foul? when balkman altered his shot by just being in the area? you want a call? go to the hole and draw a legit foul. what about when rip fell to the floor when marbury just touched him? that was not a foul. that also put marbury on the bench because he fouled out on that play. he had 41 points. </div>Agree. HE got a f*cking pussy cvall by getitng marbury fouled out of the game
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nykfan4life @ Dec 28 2006, 12:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>give me a break. even if it was a foul, like you claim, it's a tap on the wrist. the nba has too many pussy fouls called and that shouldn't have been called. hamilton got enough calls his way the whole game. where was the second foul? when balkman altered his shot by just being in the area? you want a call? go to the hole and draw a legit foul. what about when rip fell to the floor when marbury just touched him? that was not a foul. that also put marbury on the bench because he fouled out on that play. he had 41 points. </div>Ok I can almost guarantee that you would not be saying this if this was against your knicks - but that is not the case so you are allowed to be a homer on this.Also, I am now a little perplexed by what a foul in your definition might be. 1. A rake against both of Rip's arms wasn't a foul.2. An elbow, and a push wasn't a foul.What is?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ReppinTheD @ Dec 28 2006, 12:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ok I can almost guarantee that you would not be saying this if this was against your knicks - but that is not the case so you are allowed to be a homer on this.Also, I am now a little perplexed by what a foul in your definition might be. 1. A rake against both of Rip's arms wasn't a foul.2. An elbow, and a push wasn't a foul.What is?</div>no actually I wouldn't because I don't agree with the way officials call fouls. the nba has too many rules that favor the offense which will lead to more points scored and which will lead to more games being watched by fans because people want to see scoring. that "foul" is an example of that. good thing it wasn't called because that isn't a foul in my standards and not because it favored the knicks.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ReppinTheD @ Dec 27 2006, 11:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>That was a VERY blatant foul on Rip. He got hit twice, and nothing.</div>blatant? a blatant foul, he would've been taken down like mardy collins did to jr smith.
also mohammed missed like 10 layups that could've put the game away and your guys had like 5 open jumpers in a row down the stretch and missed.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nykfan4life @ Dec 28 2006, 12:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>also mohammed missed like 10 layups that could've put the game away and your guys had like 5 open jumpers in a row down the stretch and missed.</div>Yeah man - Nazr isnt doin the job man. He had like a million missed lay up attempts.
Dang what a game. I'll give the Knicks that. They kept it close, and were ahead for a great deal of the game.Rip Hamilton was BAAAAALLLLLLIIIIN! 51 POINTS!
