Re: Villanueva's playing time is down. The Bucks have been winning a lot lately and Villanueva has only been playing 22 or so minutes and comes off the bench. We honestly play better with Skinner in the lineup with his defensive. Kind of sad, dissapointing. I guess Stott's has finally had it with his piss poor defense.
Re: Villanueva's playing time is down. Lol, you should run the princeton offense like every other defenseless team. I thought Villanueva would be a key addition to the bucks its wierd, but I did notice you guys barely played him in the Bucks victory over us last night. He could work well as a sixth man though.
Re: Villanueva's playing time is down. Do I remember right in him playing four minutes last night? Why hasn't he been playing much? They played pretty well with him playing that little last night.
Re: Villanueva's playing time is down. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (yankshater213 @ Dec 31 2006, 06:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Do I remember right in him playing four minutes last night? Why hasn't he been playing much? They played pretty well with him playing that little last night.</div> He played 3 minutes and 21 seconds last night. He came in, got all 4 of his shots blocked and played terribly. I'm guessing some problems internally. A guy like Villanueva doesn't get benched for poor defense only, something has to be going on, or Stott's is trying to make a statment or get to him or something. Villanueva's defense has been atrocious and VERY hard to watch, CB4 didn't lie when he bashed his defense, one of the softest defenders I've ever seen. Brian Skinner (who we love in Milwaukee) is getting more and more minutes because of his hustle, toughness, strength. And Charlie Bell's been playing SF which leaves Patterson as our 6th man, and he's been kicking major ass there. With that lineup we are quicker on the perimeter and stronger/tougher without Villanueva. I love what Stott's is doing. Many coaches wouldn't have the stones to play Villanueva 3 minutes.
