Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Jan 2, 2016.

  1. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,380
    Likes Received:
    25,435
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Confessions are certainly good evidence. But I think there was more to the prosecutions case than the confessions.

    barfo
     
  2. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    "Government should maul its citizens"
    --barfo
     
  3. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    7 other charges were dropped. Insufficient evidence, or whatever excuse you can think of.
     
  4. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,380
    Likes Received:
    25,435
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Sure. So?

    barfo
     
  5. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    So government didn't prove anything.

    A law meant to be used against terrorists burning down public works was used against them. Jury had little choice because they admitted they set fires, which is what people have traditionally done there for centuries. The judge thought it was a sham.

    The government mauled them.
     
  6. oldfisherman

    oldfisherman Unicorn Wrangler

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Podunk suburbs
    I get the impression that some people think our court system is designed to prove who is guilty or innocent and being fair while doing it.

    The sad truth is, our court system is all about procedure, not who is right or wrong. The side that comes out ahead is the side that exerts the most pressure on the procedure process without making mistakes in the process. The process can be abused to come out ahead, such as outspending the opposition and their resources. Other times the process can be abused by testing a new law, as is being done to the Hammonds.

    Notice I did not say which side wins the case, but which side comes out ahead. My personal opinion is the only ones that win in court cases are the attorneys. Win or lose, all of the attorneys involved feed their kid's college funds.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2016
    Nikolokolus, MarAzul and Denny Crane like this.
  7. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Oh, that is worth jail time!! Very good for voter turnout! Our big City voters will love it!!

    Fuck!
     
  8. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    The courts are supposed to be one of two things: determine the truth or administer justice. The two are at odds.

    If you can't win at the ballot box, you find a biased judge who is on your side.
     
  9. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,380
    Likes Received:
    25,435
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Maybe... here's a thought... they shouldn't have set the fires?

    barfo
     
  10. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Well, I don't know... I do know it's not good to wrestle with a pig.
     
  11. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,380
    Likes Received:
    25,435
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    And yet you keep wrestling with me...

    barfo
     
  12. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
  13. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    4,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    Looks like they get all kinds of swag!

     
  14. WarriorFan

    WarriorFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Can someone please answer a very basic question for me. How is it that starting a fire can cover up poaching? Isn't the evidence gone once you pick up the deer and remove it from the land where it can't be shot?
     
  15. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    4,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    Maybe they shot the deer and then, found a fake decoy deer. Maybe a plush one? They put the plush deer in the forest. Then they burn the forest and everyone assumes that the burnt up plush deer was the deer that used to be on government lands. There actually is a fictionalized reenactment of this in a movie I once saw. I think it was called Bambi.
     
  16. Denny Crane

    Denny Crane It's not even loaded! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    72,978
    Likes Received:
    10,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Never lost a case
    Location:
    Boston Legal
    And then they stored a bunch of emails on Hillary's secret server and blamed it on her.
     
  17. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Keeping slaves is what people have traditionally done there for centuries too, but now it is a Federal crime, as is poaching and destroying evidence and recklessly endangering lives and arson for profit...
     
  18. MARIS61

    MARIS61 Real American

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    28,007
    Likes Received:
    5,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired Yankee
    Location:
    Beautiful Central Oregon
    Almost half of a deer is guts, which are usually left at the site of the kill and cleaned up by crows and coyotes over the next week or so depending on the weather.
     
  19. Further

    Further Guy

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    11,099
    Likes Received:
    4,039
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Stuff doer
    Location:
    Place
    not only that, but the legs are also cut off and left behind. I came upon a spot a while ago that must have had 20 legs spread out and hundreds of pounds in gut piles. Its much easier to carry out only the parts you want to keep. A different time on a hike I found a deer that must have been shot a dozen times. nothing was carted away, it was just target practice for some asshole.

    As far as this topic goes, I just don't know enough and don't feel like going down the rabbit hole to try and figure it all out. From a glance, seems like you have a few groups. 1) the original people who got arrested who likely were a bunch of peckerwoods, but got screwed by power hungry people too. And 2) the "patriots" whom I believe are very misguided but mostly have good intentions, 3) the law enforcement who should be commended for not turning this into some unneeded shootout.
     
  20. oldfisherman

    oldfisherman Unicorn Wrangler

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Podunk suburbs
    A large forest wildfire is not going to destroy all of the poaching evidence that is laying on the ground, but it might cook some of it. A brush fire will do very little damage to poaching evidence. (the Hammond's are accused of setting a brush fire, not a forest fire)

    If? The hunting guide had reported the poaching soon after the brush fire started? The Oregon Fish & Wildlife dept would have investigated the sight when it was safe to do so. They have enforcement officers on call to make quick responses to poaching reports. (a phone call to 800-452-7888 poaching hotline will get an investigator on sight fast, there is a $250 reward for turning in a deer poacher, if convicted) The dept. enforcement officers are a division of the Oregon state police, and could have charged the Hammond's with poaching. The only mention I see of poaching was made at the trial by the guide, not by any enforcement officer or govt. prosecutor.

    Most people do not know this, but the Fish & Wildlife service has a very complete forensic lab similar to forensic labs used by state police and the FBI. Even if a fire damaged the poaching evidence, there is a lot they could have learned from it to help in a poaching trial.

    The entire poaching topic, if it even occurred, is a blue herring topic.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2016
    Denny Crane likes this.

Share This Page