OT Do you think getting rid of the lottery would benefit the NBA?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94, Jan 17, 2016.

?

Do you think getting rid of the lottery would benefit the NBA?

  1. Yes, the worst team should always pick first.

    2 vote(s)
    8.7%
  2. No, it would promote even more tanking.

    21 vote(s)
    91.3%
  1. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Poor teams still need goods players to help keep the league on somewhat of a level playing field. I do think there need to be sought changes.

    If a team has a Top 3 pick, the next year the highest they can get is #4. Don't reward teams like Philly for continually taking.

    Also, if a team makes the Final 8 in the Playoffs and had another teams pick, the highest it can be is #4. It's great that they made a smart move but a Title contender shouldn't be adding a To 3 pick as well. They'll still get a very good player.

    I'd also like to see Compensatory picks for Top Tier FA's that leave with the spurned team getting nothing in return.
     
    PtldPlatypus likes this.
  2. rasheedfan2005

    rasheedfan2005 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    8,543
    Likes Received:
    4,673
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Giggity...
     
  3. Sinobas

    Sinobas Banned User BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    14,608
    Likes Received:
    5,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think what they should do is cut the playoffs down to 12 teams. Ideally eliminate the conference seeding. Because the last 4 teams are usually not nearly good enough to complete in the playoffs anyway.
     

Share This Page