Voted for the obvious answer. But between the two intended options, I believe Hilary is more intentional in her "evil", whereas Obama actually has decent intentions, but is (in the mind of most conservatives) "misguided" in his efforts.
Let's dispense with this notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing. barfo
I don't view Obama as evil. I see him as an extreme idealist. Clinton maybe evil as the result of being extremely greedy for power. barfo is not evil, although he may want to be.
I'm curious, how is she any more greedy for power than anyone else who is running or who has ever run for President? barfo
True, except for the fact that Obama is incompetent. Otherwise he wouldn't have handed over a big chunk of the treasury to insurance companies.
I sort of think of it as the idealist rather than incompetent. But either way, they are not keeping the bargan, that is why Moda is in trouble.