Official Kevin Hayes and Dan Boyle suck thread

Discussion in 'New York Rangers' started by kreidertime, Mar 13, 2016.

  1. NYR2009

    NYR2009 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The lines were horrible, I am agreeing.

    Why does he separate Brassard and Zucarello?

    Lines should be:
    Nash Brassard Zucarello
    Krider Stepan Fast
    Miller Stall Stallberg
    Linberg Moore Glass

    Hayes should be scratched, period. The only other thing I will try is changing Krider with Miller. Maybe Krider can learn a thing or two from Stall. This is the team! Why AV is trying something different is beyond me.
     
  2. NYR2009

    NYR2009 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    18
    or you can try putting Miller on Brass' line, IMO Nash should play on Stepan's line or Brass', Miller should play on either of top 3, and Krider either on Stepan's or Stall's. That is it! AV is trying to be creative for no reason, and why Stall with Boyle are second pair Ds?
     
  3. chuckd3534

    chuckd3534 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    8,794
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The more I think about it the ore I think he should put Hayes in the top 9 and let it fly. That is our best hope. That is how we can get enough depth to really win. Hayes is not a 4th line guy, that role is not suited for him at all IMO.

    I would go back to basics and go:

    Miller/Brass/Zucc
    Kreider/Step/Fast
    Nash/Staal/Hayes
    Lindberg/Moore/Stalberg

    I think that gives us balance and depth. Playing Hayes on the 4th line is asking for trouble. That is a bad spot for him. I may switch Stalberg and Fast though because I like the idea of Fast on the 4th line. I think he would really be a good fit there. Then have Stalberg with CK and Step. Again good balance and depth.

    We need Hayes...I really don't see a way around it. So with that being the case I think getting him off the 4th line is the play.
     
  4. Stepupstepan

    Stepupstepan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,463
    Likes Received:
    372
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I like your lines except I would not play Nash with Staal AND Hayes. This line would be slow as molasses. I would move down CK to see if he can click with Staal and move up the big pussy with Stepan. Of course we need that lazy dog Hayes. Our extra forward is Glass...LOL It is a joke.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2016
  5. cagedlion

    cagedlion "I am the problem, and I am the solution."

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    10,424
    Likes Received:
    7,931
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYC
    ??????????before any one thinks about beating
    the Caps [unless the Rangers become a WildCard
    during this past month], I'd worry about the
    Islanders and/or Penguins.
     
  6. mrmel29

    mrmel29 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    10,413
    Likes Received:
    4,762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And before I worry about what guys play with what guy on the forward lines (pretty much should be interchangeable) if we don't straighten the defense to the point where they can get out of their own end as hillary would say "what difference does it make". If AV doesn't change his slow as molasses defense staal, girardi, boyle and klein from the current impossible to play man to man to a zone defense I don't see how it changes.
     

Share This Page