Please tell me why she is going to be indicted. Between 2009 and 2013, personal email servers were not illegal. Slate.com: "The Times, for example, reports only that Clinton “may have violated federal requirements.” The Wall Street Journal, likewise, says it’s “unclear” whether she did. Still, that neither paper—nor anyone else—has been able to find a specific law that Clinton violated is telling. My search has also come up empty." What LAW did she break?
18 USC §1924 http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:18 section:1924 edition:prelim) Does that qualify as a LAW?
18 U.S. Code § 798 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) 18 U.S. Code § 641 18 U.S. Code § 1505 Several more. Are these LAWS?
How anyone could stick up for Hillary and the lies she's said regarding the email server is appalling to me.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...lary-clintons-email-did-she-follow-all-rules/ Metcalfe pointed to Clinton’s use of the word "allowed" and "opted" throughout her press conference, when referring to her decision to use private email. He said both words give the false impression that the law and its proper implementation presented her with a choice. She might have been "allowed" to use only a private email account in that no one stopped her, Metcalfe said, but that’s not the same thing as lawfully complying with rules
Taxi cab confessions is nice. Haven't watched that since I was in high school but loved it. Katie Morgan just annoys me.
Indeed it does. Let's read what it says: "without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location" She had authority and had no intent to retain at an unauthorized location. She was Secretary of State and the server was authorized under law at that time. I really don't get what law she supposedly broke. You all throw so much shit at her (travelgate, whitewater, etc. - all much ado about nothing), just as you did Obama (his birthplace), that it's really hard to discern when something you guys allege might be actually be legit for once.
"BAH GAWD, KING! TRUMP'S TOSSED HER OFF OF THE STAGE AND STRAIT TO HELL! BAH GAWD, SHE'S BEEN BROKEN IN HALF! SOMEBODY STOP THE DAMN DEBATE!" Yeah, that would be epic, lmao. I can't stand women with fake tits. So she gets a thumbs down in my book. I really hope Trump wins. If he gets the nomination, then it would send a clear message that the country is sick of the direction we're going in and wants a change. Someone who's strong on crime, strong on immigration policies, strong on gun rights, and strong against foreign aggression and terrorism. Not someone who's a career politician, who's going to tell us the same ol' bullshit over and over again. I WOULD say "someone who's not going to tell us what we want to hear". But Trump is doing plenty of that in his own way. It's a new kind of bullshit I can get behind. If for no other reason than I want to see Liberals all over this country cry for 4 strait years (possibly 8 if he's reelected). I'm under no illusions here: he's not perfect, and I don't agree with everything he says. But I like his strong language and decisive tone. He doesn't give a shit about offending the PC Police and whiny Liberals. And it's looking more and more like the majority of America feels the same way.
Donald Trump's grammar 'typical of children aged 11 and under' The grammar used by Donald Trump in his speeches as he campaigns to become the Republican presidential candidate corresponds to that used by students aged 11 and under. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ge-typical-of-children-under-11-a6936256.html
