Nice Metric Tote- basically, a 10K year cyclic phenom....I can only imagine how much Methane a Dinosaur exhausted, vs today's livestock....? good thing modern man wasn't around then, or one would blow themselves up, if lighting a match within 100 miles ...?
. . ...there is a lot more heat energy in the atmosphere than there has been in a long time and it has been increasing rapidly in the last 80-100 years or so. http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/global-warming-stopped
You're not too obsessed with Trump are you? Nah, course not. Still can't seem to figure why a candidate is being branded (by a "law and order"guy) as some kind of racist jerk who insists on building and securing a physical boundary on a border which is well documented and widely accepted as being a sieve for masses of unknown undocumented people slipping into communities many many who are uneducated (even in their OWN LANGUAGE), possibly/probably carrying contagious deseases and OBVIOUSLY many of them also career criminals with a real possibility of some being terrorists and lastly being practically a free-zone for smuggling drugs. While this same candidate has NEVER ONCE called out and criticized Mexican American CITIZENS - you're beginning to sound like those "horrible dishonest" members of the media Trump has mentioned time and again. They got it wrong the first time by failing to emphasize that Trump was talking about those who are here illegally committing crimes, and those who are entering illegally.....until the morons in the media finally got it right, but you haven't yet caught up. lol As for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration and refugees ("until we figure out what the hell is going on") , have you forgotten that the terrorists have admitted they will try and plant some agents amoung them?.....AND, France,Germany and Belgium are now drastically reconsidering their "refugee"/ immigrant policies and a recent poll from Germany showed 90% against further immigration from Muslim nations. And 30 Governors were against accepting refugees - all but one of them were Republicans.....so maybe they are kinda in line with Trump....though he said it first. lol Help me out with this - what makes you think the U.S. will be better off nationally and globally with an ultra conservative like Cruz who has shown no indication whatsoever of being capable of flexibility, adapting to changing situations unable and/or unwilling to work with others who aren't like minded? Eisenhower deported millions of illegals, Clinton also. As for China and Mexico.....unless you haven't been paying attention or hard of hearing- Trump has said he has nothing against their "people" but their leaders are more cunning and SMARTER than the bozos who have been negotiating and dealing for America. Those leaders have either ripped us off, and/or used us as a dumping ground for undesirables according to Trump- and I see no reason to disagree. I guess you really believe Trump will trample on the Constitution and will be the first "President" in history without a cabinet, advisors including a couple of Constitutional Lawyers. So be it. You're entitled to your opinion. By the way, there's a very fair chance Trump won't get the necessary delegates, or Cruz beating him in the remaining primaries, or Trump being rejected at the Convention. Don't panic, the Republic will stand. But I would be more concerned with a race baiting former incompetent lying Secretary of State who leans left and will continue to use the politics of division between races, rich and poor, male and female.
Yup - after all, you are always correct, your opinions are always more valuable and accurate, and of course you are never wrong. It's all good. Groovy!
Way TMI, and personal affronts..... "thought provoking" (in another post-insight into character?)..... Disclaimer: for those "thinking" Don't hurt yourself.... "Thinking" - what a concept...
Other than the fact that prior to 1950 the co2 measurements are estimated and its well understood that there is a natural saturation range for co2 in ice core samples that they just pinned to a global temp model? the so-called "settled science" isn't science. we still don't have any accurate methods to measure human activity impact on the planet. lets start there first. to the best approximation, green houses gases, ie. everything except nitrogen and oxygen have remained at a 3% level for the history of planet earth. i'm happy to discuss any theory that can account for that.
...CO2 levels were no more or no less "estimated" than the others...and why is CO2 your only barometer? I'll ask again, do you believe humans are having an adverse effect on the climate or not?...simple yes or no. ...and can you provide something that actually DISPROVES the theory?...NASA and NOAA and others certainly disagree with you.
