I am ON TOPIC.....stop blowing smoke and READ AGAIN: Remains to be seen- primaries arent over, and IF, IF, Trump were to become the GOP Nominee, rest easy, he will tear Queen Hillary a new blow hole. Last I checked, and I could be wrong.....the general election is quite a few months away.....and last I checked, Ronald Reagan was also considerably behind Jimmy Carter at one point in the "polls" BEFORE the election. I could be wrong.......or am I? Now get on the ball, and try not to become dazed and confused and embarrassingingly prejudiced as you are with Cashman.
...one more time, and please try as best you can to keep up..."the primaries have nothing to do with the "general election" projections."... The "general election" is AFTER the primaries are over...this should be a simple concept. ...And because I have an opinion about Trump's ability does not mean I am "prejudiced"... My opinion of Trump was developed AFTER he announced he was running so I did not "pre-judge" him. ...and Jesus tap dancing Christ, what does Cashman have to do with this topic?...you just can't help yourself, can you?...you simply are not content unless you make every thread your personal play ground for things that have nothing to do with the subject matter...stay on topic or don't respond. If you cannot do that the powers that be can take proper action.
Chump is not even close to being a "Statesman" to represent 300 Million American's ... His version of "Diplomacy" is only taught in Pre-School ... This video makes me think of Chump, when he's blowing his own horn, and patting his own back, while his goons beat the hell out of those whose views oppose his own ignorance...
http://www.vox.com/2016/3/31/11336884/donald-trump-polls-winning http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...ls-donald-trump-not-prepared-to-be-president/ http://time.com/4278295/donald-trump-loyalty-pledge-south-carolina-delegates/
Saw the Kasich interview, he's spot on...!!! From the Drudge Retort: Trump Thinks Supreme Court Investigates Crimes Posted: 31 Mar 2016 03:49 PM PDT Donald Trump has an interesting concept of what, exactly, Supreme Court justices do. Asked about what kind of nominees he would appoint to the Supreme Court, Trump said, "Well I would probably appoint people that would look very seriously at her email disaster, because it's a criminal activity, and I would appoint people that would look very seriously at that. ... You talk about a case, a real case, that nothing seems to be happening." At a debate earlier this year, Trump said that judges sign bills. and- Donald Trump's Rapidly Changing Policy Positions Posted: 31 Mar 2016 04:30 AM PDT While most presidential candidates craft detailed platforms and spend years trying to sell them to voters, GOP front-runner Donald Trump sometimes takes up two or three contradictory policy positions in the same week -- or even the same interview. It's difficult to glean a platform from Trump's powerfully incoherent rhetoric while navigating the quicksand-like task of separating fact from Trump's many exaggerations and outright falsehoods in thousands of interviews. It's perhaps harder still to get the GOP front-runner to address policy questions directly. The candidate often declines to offer specifics, arguing that unpredictability is an advantage he'll use to cut better deals, just as his critics say this is a sign he doesn't know what he's talking about. these also are spot on, bulls fkng eye...
Trump may be the first candidate to ever hit 0% favorability with women. Frankly I think this is subconscious self destruction. His ego got him stuck doing something he can't get out of.
...and puhlease, give me a break Mr. Backtracker, ...exactly what was "taken out of context"? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/01/trump-on-abortion-remarks-it-could-be-that-missipoke.html
He's gotta' be very close to goose eggs with Women...even in the GOP, Women can't stand this guy...and I can see why, Chump's only going to get Fishermen Votes, flip flop, flip flop, like a Trout upon netting...
...^^^ Very good articles 59,- (#489 and #490)... Another 5 year old tantrum, by blaming someone else, before stating "I misspoke" only after proven wrong. clipped from article- The Blame Game: Trump made the remarks, had edited out parts of the discussion with commentator Chris Matthews. "This was a long, convoluted question," Trump said. "This was a long discussion and they just cut it out." MSNBC responded later Thursday with a statement saying: "The town hall interview with Donald Trump was taped in advance and then aired in its entirety. Absolutely no part of the exchange between Trump and Chris Matthews was edited out." Trump acknowledged later in the interview that, "It could be that I misspoke."
http://freebeacon.com/columns/how-to-dump-trump/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=e223697994-WFB_Morning_Beacon_04_01_163_31_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-e223697994-45993021 just a glimpse of this article: John McCormack of the Weekly Standard has done the math: Beat Trump in Wisconsin, in Indiana, and in Nebraska, split the delegates in Oregon and Washington, defeat him in South Dakota, Montana, and California, and he’ll fall short. They should stop. If Donald Trump and Chris Christie and Sarah Palin and Ben Carson and Jeff Sessions and Sean Hannity want to leave, well, arrivederci. The rules are the rules, and if you do not win by the rules, you do not get to rewrite them on the fly. Indeed, Trump’s predilection for changing the rules to better satisfy his interests, his whims—the very definition of authoritarian rule—is one reason he should not become president. Just because the party is split doesn’t mean the more obnoxious candidate wins. Nor is Trump the only one ready to bolt: If he does win the nomination, he’s certain to drive many college-educated and suburban and church-attending Republicans out of the party—probably more voters than would follow him if he left. Don’t their opinions count? Or is anger and reverse snobbery the only legitimate currency in this divided and embittered movement? The GOP survived the departure of Pat Buchanan and his acolytes. If it can’t survive the departure of Donald Trump, maybe it needs to take a good long look in the mirror and think about some of its life choices. Conversely, if the Republicans horrified at the prospect of the least qualified and most disliked president in American history are forced to leave the party, and to run an independent conservative candidate in a last-ditch attempt to deny Trump the presidency, the populists and nationalists might want to do some soul-searching of their own. None of us is exempt from standards of morality, decency, and responsibility. Not me, not you, not five year olds, not even Donald Trump and his supporters.
Here are a shitload of good articles on the Tyrant Trump. From 'White Nationalist Thugs, Gravitating to Trump and Why'? To- 'Trump-the Art of Self Sabotage'. Or- "Nominating Trump is Political Suicide". http://www.nationalreview.com/?utm_...ail&utm_campaign=GFile04012016&utm_term=GFile
And so on and so forth. None of us actually know how he will govern if he ever got elected. I can remember when "they" used to refer to candidate Ronald Reagan as Ronald Ray-Gun..... remember? Too young? Forgot? I most definately understand how Trump's campaign tactics and miscellaneous comments can easily be judged as unstable, rude/crude, childish ect..... As I've (and a couple of others) have pointed out- unfortunately he has no filter and speaks and uses the "language" often in terms of a lifelong New Yorker dealing in real estate, building, investing and not needing to be a well refined orator dazzling with million dollar words and mini speeches.... (likewise most of the heavy hitters he deals with in the same fields). The man's first primary stated policies were securing the southern border which WILL PAY FOR ITSELF by drastically curtailing the flow of drugs and illegal invaders which WILL cost hundreds of millions of dollars in resources resulting from all of which comes hand in hand with the scourge of HEROIN (crime), young Americans' lives being ruined, police and medical costs, overcrowding in local schools and of course public assistance. And when he said Mexico is NOT sending their best across the border - i.e. career criminals and many many unskilled uneducated people EVEN IN THEIR "NATIVE" LANGUAGE.....he was/is correct, and exit polls from voters throughout the primaries in fact also agreed with him to the tune of approx 65% on his "temp" ban on muslim immigration into our country. Gee whiz, there must be alot of "Hitlers" ....from southern states, northern states, Western state, rust belt States..... yep.....Looks like Trump the buffoon was right on target WITH THE PEOPLE and smart enough to recognize the dangers and problems on a very gutsy and brave stance. It's called leadership......BEFORE reading the "polls". Honestly, I am a bit disappointed AND SURPRISED that many actually believe (if Trump were Prez) he would personally insult foreign leaders on their personal appearances and facial traits during discussions/negotiations. Are you guys serious? Seriously? lol For all we know, a Trump Presidency could easily be nondescipt with our current brand of gutless Republicans - or if Democrats win alot of seats in the general election. I like Ted Cruz, solid conservative - seems to be a good guy with his heart in the right place, but don't "we" have ANY(?) reservations about having an unyielding rigid ultra conservative doing our bidding on the world' s stage? In any case, for what it's worth, since when has Mr. Cruz been tested under fire and in charge of ANYTHING? Anyway, there's a very fair chance Trump isn't going to get the needed 1237 delegates, or maybe Cruz eventually comes out on top..... .... and there's a much BETTER chance Trump will be ousted at the convention. Don't panic, contrary to some people's beliefs, Trump isn't the second coming of Hitler.........I thought only "operatives", and shmucky, jerky mushhead socialist-leaning young people were going along with the propaganda. I have no problem if Cruz WINS nomination but I'm in the minority because I truly believe during a campaign vs Hillary in the next few months, Trump will take off the gloves and do a better job of absolutely ridiculing her and turning her into a walking joke. ➡ jmho
John Kasich has won ONE state. Yeah sure he has favorable "polls" vs Hillary in a potential November matchup ......he's the closest thing to Hillary out of ALL the candidates......lmao He's a wishy washy cliche machine trying to be the folksy regular guy who feels everyone's pain. Sorry but, his bullsh!t means nothing to me. He couldn't break 50% (46.8) of the vote in his home state while Trump had a good showing coming in 2nd place with 35.6. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if during a general election campaign vs Hillary,... Trump will be capable of winning Ohio by hammering home his specialty of pointing out and explaining how lousy trade and economic deals have harmed Ohio and cost thousands of jobs.....while Kasich sings his tired mantra of "lowering taxes". lol
Using shit for a Chum Line, and no one is biting.. Insulting me, won't get you a cracker and milk.... Forget I've been in Caly longer than You've been on Earth....? what's the Nationalistic slander du jour today???, White Thugs for Chump...? keep up, your too young to recall this stuff, on 2nd thought, don't keep up, I don't have time for uninformed Nationalistic Idenitarians... "I was rather surprised by this open disrespect for America’s founding document, especially from someone to the right of Genghis Khan". Today’s white supremacists sound much like the campus social-justice warriors they claim to despise. https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/433215/donald-trump-white-supremacist-supporters http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430137/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428408/donald-trump-populism-corruption-conservatism The intellectual achievements of the Western Enlightenment tradition go practically unmentioned among identitarians, whose tenuous identification with “the West” boils down to something as nebulous and immaterial as skin color. In a moody promotional video that’s part Scientology recruitment film, part Mein Kampf, and part motivational poster from a shrink’s office, Spencer inveighs against “abstractions and buzzwords” such as “democracy and freedom.” “A nation based on freedom is just another place to go shopping,” he says dismissively. “It’s a country for everyone, and thus a country for no one. A country in which we ourselves have become strangers.” Identitarians wholeheartedly reject the Enlightenment, as did fascists and Communists before them. Chump is in the self destruction, implosion mode, and so are His followers, ambassadors of hatred....
back to ignore....you bore the shit out of me, with elementary tactics, slurs, FLAMING, and clueless strewed logic, "slightly to the right of Genghis Khan".....
...Matts, did you notice there was no dispute of anything Kasich said?...wonder why?...the fact is everything Kasich said is true. ...also getting a laugh at comparing Reagan to Trump at any level.
Same old name calling (usually a favorite tactic of the left when they can't refute or sensibly discuss actual issues).... and of course the obligatory impertinent historical comparisons....lol.....try actually addressing the particulars of policies instead of relying on simplistic name calling and characatures.......you're beginning to remind me of the little kid who would use chalk to write nasty things on the sidewalk and street about some other kid who may have kicked your butt in an "argument" over a baseball player......lmao......you're beautiful!
