The effects on cap space of Lillard's extension

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by UKRAINEFAN, May 23, 2016.

  1. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    14,898
    Likes Received:
    12,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    Was this ever discussed when the extension took place? That it would take 13 million off our cap space? That if Lillard had waited, that I (and Olshey) wouldn't have to think about renouncing both Leonard and Harkless in order to sign two max agents?
    Is this something Lillard insisted on? Or did Olshey do it on his own; did he think the club and fan morale needed a boost? Did he think that free agents wouldn't come here unless he wrapped up Lillard ahead of time?
    http://www.blazersedge.com/2016/5/2...-nba-free-agency-cap-space-contract-extension
     
  2. B-Roy

    B-Roy If it takes months

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    31,701
    Likes Received:
    24,927
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I imagine it had to do with goodwill on both sides, to show commitment towards each other. Also it makes Lillard eligible for the "Rose Rule". Have to imagine he wanted that.

    Also probably a bit of misjudgment on NO's part. He probably didn't think we would be good enough to lure a max free agent anyways, no one could have expected this.
     
    BonesJones and 42N8Bounce like this.
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,245
    Likes Received:
    30,437
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    It's only an issue if this is true: "The Blazers are more than one player away from contention, as Dave Deckard outlined last week. They need to upgrade at least two frontcourt positions if they hope to vault into the upper echelon of the Western Conference standings."

    Yes, if you think that the Blazers need a max contract FA at one big man position AND a $13 mil or so FA at the other big slot, then it makes a big difference. OTOH, if you think that one or more of Plumlee, Davis, Leonard or Vonleh has the chops to be a starter on a contending-level team, then it doesn't make any difference at all since those guys are either tied up on reasonable contracts or can be given new contracts via Bird rights. Given that if the Blazers are committed to CJ, I don't think they can afford more than 3 max-level contracts, so they'd better be of the opinion that those guys are either good enough or can be traded for guys who are.
     
    BBert and 42N8Bounce like this.
  4. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    There's no way Lillard will let a few dollars stop him from getting a title. And I'm sure they can structure the contract so that the bulk payment is structured for the back end. (cough Tom Brady.) Or Paul Allen can just hire a company that Dame has a controlling interest in. (cough Tom Brady) Or I guess we could just CHEAT like Tom f-cking Brady!
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2016
  5. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Portland is going to have a hell of a time getting 1 max FA to agree to come here - let alone 2. There are only 4 FA at are even worth a max contract.
    Much ado about nothing....
     
  6. UKRAINEFAN

    UKRAINEFAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    14,898
    Likes Received:
    12,072
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    un-retired
    Location:
    Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine
    And some people think I'm a pessimist? I think in our situation it might be easier to get two than one since we will need that extra firepower to convince either one that we are a legitimate contender.
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2016
  7. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    126,189
    Likes Received:
    146,498
    Trophy Points:
    115
    1. If he hadn't signed last offseason people would have been freaking out thinking Lillard wanted to leave.

    2. Hard to ask his teammates to commit to the team when he hasn't.

    3. One bad injury and he doesn't sign for as much money. Not worth the risk.
     
  8. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,580
    Likes Received:
    38,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    An extra $10M doesn't have to be used towards a max contract. It could've meant signing a Biyombo or a Marvin Williams
     
  9. Rhal

    Rhal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    12,997
    Likes Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    UPS
    Location:
    Portland
    I'm not exactly why this is a big deal. When a player on a rookie deal earns a max contract they never wait to sign it unless they are trying to force their way out.
     
  10. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,454
    Likes Received:
    25,534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Now, don't try to be humble. It really is all about signing you to a max deal. Accept it.

    barfo
     

Share This Page