You won't have to write him in, Johnson will be on the ballot in all 50 states, as I understand it. All you have to do is go into the voting booth, find your Johnson, and pull it. barfo
Agnostic and atheist are not mutually exclusive terms. Agnostic refers to knowledge, atheist refers to (lack of) belief. So you can be both agnostic and religious or agnostic and atheist. Most atheists are also agnostic. You may disagree with me, but from my experience in real life and on the internet that is absolutely what the majority of self proclaimed atheists believe.
If I saw a voice coming from a burning bush, I would first think it was some sort of trick. Only after all avenues of legitimate explanations exhausted would I consider something supernatural or paranormal. Even then, I'd assume there's a better answer that I just can't figure out. It would take a significant deliberate act that only a god could do to make me believe. After all, the bar is set high. That's the extent of my agnosticism. I am quite confident there is no such thing.
Saul was like that. He killed christians he hated them so much and after getting knocked off his horse and temporarily blinded he went on to be the greatest preacher in history and pen a major portion of the new testament. When faced with crucifiction he begged to be crucified upsidedown because he was not worthy to die the same way as jesus. He must have hit his head hard.
Athiest is a belief that there is no god while agnostic is more of a cop out for im too lazy to do any research so i just say i dont believe anything.
He must have hit his head hard, or maybe he had syphillus in the brain. Plenty of reasonable explanations.
That's what makes me lol about "athiests" any explination but God! You sound just like a religious nut case. It's like when certain posters stererype christians then get upset that their race or sexual prefence is stereotyped. Irony, i love it.
Any explanation but god has been working more and more. I know I don't feel anything missing in my life for not believing. Not at all.
I got tired of debating it a while ago really. They always come down to a stalemate. Pride/ego vs. Gospel Bible Christianity knows nothing of "religion" for all religions teach a means of "self-redemption" and I'll bet you believe either: 1.) you need no redemption or 2.) if you admit you have need you will earn it through the balance of the accounting of your moral "good" works against your bad deeds "later"... Biblical Christianity in contrast points the fallen sinner to his only means of redemption The Person of The Lord Jesus Christ and His Gospel. Repent of you errant beliefs or You will perish eternally in the pride of your ignorance, and denial of your condition Isaiah 1:18King James Version (KJV) 18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. I love this verse. Let us reason. Something an athiest never wants to do because the goal is never to investigate, but to stroke the ego and get a "win"
I'm fine with you being religious. If it keeps you from shooting up the liquor store, more power to you. Unless you take it to heart to harm others, using some twisted and out of context excerpt.
