USA Swimming bans former Stanford swimmer convicted of sexual assault Former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner has been banned from USA Swimming for life after he was convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman on campus in January 2015. Turner is no longer eligible for USA Swimming membership and will not be allowed to compete in any USA Swimming-sanctioned events, including the Olympic Trials, after violating the organization's Code of Conduct policy. http://www.foxsports.com/olympics/s...d-stanford-swimmer-sexual-assault-rape-060616
bodyman has addressed more posts to me. I am not reading them. bodyman has already said he's not interested in the topic, which makes him a troll. Trolls are boring. bodyman, this thread is not about you, my life is not about you, the universe is not about you. I have zero interest in your opinions or your dick. And you I'm sure would not consider me "hot". Like I said, there are jerks in the world and some post on S2. No, not calling bodyman a jerk, that's against forum rules, just saying. The issue of consent has been raised; I have tried to address it for those who may be interested. Some people, I mean, some men, are not, they just want some excuse to say it really is consenting. dviss, I would not vote for a man who uses vulgar terms for women's bodies as an insult for a man. And don't say he was talking about a cat.
Based upon past threads, only relevant if it is a forum member, a WNBA player, or you got her pregnant. Otherwise, it's TMI.
I've noticed that you hardly ever see advertisers feature Asian or Hispanic people. And marketers intentionally pick their race...so it seems they want to appeal to black people for whatever reason. I think they know their stock with white people has already plummeted.
I didn't really want to get into the race thing, but here I go: I think that many times people project their ideas about racism onto a situation. Just try this thought experiment: if the victim in this case had been black, blacks would be up in arms, assuming that he got a light sentence because he had raped a black woman. But she was not black, and he still got that light sentence, which refutes the hypothetical assumption that the sentence was light because the girl was dark. When the judge was coming up with his sentence what was rattling around in his mind? The fact that Brock had no prior history, and that it was college kids drinking might have come into play. Perhaps the judge himself had seen things like that while he was as school go unpunished? If Brock had been a little "gangsta" with a criminal history he probably would have gotten a much higher sentence.
Your last comment happens all the time. This white kid was a white silver spoon kid consistently. Ive seen hispanic people kill someone and they appeared gangster like, and when they go to trial, they style their hair, wear a suit and glasses and try to act professional, with tattoos on their face still lol
I don't think I've ever seen an Indian in a commercial, maybe that crying Indian one that's a meme from the 70s?
I think indians appear in commercials railing against the Washington Redskins' name. But you make an excellent point.
Oh yeah, that one that was played during the Super Bowl, right? I meant we never see a native dude just going in to get a hamburger or something.
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/509019 info about the use of native american imagery in marketing in general stuff like this: