What rule changes do you want to see?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by illmatic99, Aug 22, 2016.

  1. oldfisherman

    oldfisherman Unicorn Wrangler

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Podunk suburbs
    The rankings are for all NBA players regardless of position, not just guards. Sorry for the confusion.
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  2. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I disagree. Then you punish the team for working hard for offensive boards. If you do something good you should be rewarded. This IMHO would lead to worse shot percentages.
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  3. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,643
    Likes Received:
    20,336
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    Good points.

    Would you be OK with it if only coaches could call a time out and they could ONLY call a time out during a dead ball, and not during live play?
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  4. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This just sounds silly. It's not the rule that creates this at all. It's out of position referees and referees who thusly call outside of their primary area of responsibility that created the flopping problem. Notice how it isn't a problem at the NCAA/NFHS level? :dunno:
     
  5. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This would be the best compromise.

    This is genius.
     
    BlazerCaravan likes this.
  6. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Frankly, you don't know what you're talking about.
     
  7. BBert

    BBert Weasels Ripped My Flesh

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,643
    Likes Received:
    20,336
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Poster Boy
    Location:
    Blazerlandia
    But clearly, you'd actually enforce them properly. That would be a change. ;)
     
    Orion Bailey and dviss1 like this.
  8. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm a purist.
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  9. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know if any of you get out and watch any Varsity HS games. But I'd be happy to post my schedule. Any of you feel free to come watch me work.
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  10. Orion Bailey

    Orion Bailey Forum Troll

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Messages:
    26,285
    Likes Received:
    21,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would, especially if Madison High is involved.
     
  11. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How is that a punishment? You honestly don't think 14 seconds is enough to get a decent shot up after an offensive rebound?

    I'd really be curious to see what the average clock usage time is on second-chance shots, and the percentages thereon. I'd wager that shortening the clock would have a negligible effect on shooting percentages, but would (as BC suggested) increase overall possessions, and thereby shots, scoring, and overall action.
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2016
    illmatic99 likes this.
  12. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope. You get the rebound. If you don't have an immediate putback you kick it out. Now your down to 10-11 seconds. Just time for a bad shot.

    Conversely, if your opponent gets the o-board, the defense should be penalized by having to play defense for another 20-24 secs. It's really on averge like 6 seconds we'd save for every o-board.
     
  13. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, I'd call for a small overhaul of the entire shotclock: it shouldn't reset to 14 on a half-court possession (i.e., when a foul occurs and play resets with the same team holding possession), it should reset to 16 (14 is a holdover from the "10 seconds to get over the half court line" era). Now, with that set up, I'd make any shot clock resets that result in the offensive team retaining the ball in their half of the court result in 16 seconds because there's no need to go back over half court.
     
    BBert and Orion Bailey like this.
  14. BlazerCaravan

    BlazerCaravan Hug a Bigot... to Death

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    10,384
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But the reset to 14 vs 24 had to do with being in your half of the court already (the 10 seconds being reserved to get over half court). If you kick it out, you have the same amount of time as an inbound after a stoppage foul.
     
    Orion Bailey likes this.
  15. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Meh. How many offensive boards are there a game? Not enough to institute this great of a change. This doesn't fix a problem. And of it ain't broke....
     
  16. oldfisherman

    oldfisherman Unicorn Wrangler

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Podunk suburbs
  17. Orion Bailey

    Orion Bailey Forum Troll

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Messages:
    26,285
    Likes Received:
    21,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Beat me to it. Compromise. 16 seconds. Your allowed 8 in the backcourt, so give them the 16, not 24.
     
  18. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't address a problem. This is making a rule for the sake of making one.

    Rule changes should fix problems.

    JUST like I predicted: The flopping fines didn't fix one thing. It did exactly what I said the new rule would do. It created a new revenue stream for the NBA.
     
  19. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,612
    Likes Received:
    27,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't address a problem. This is not fixing anything.
     
  20. Natebishop3

    Natebishop3 Don't tread on me!

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Messages:
    94,053
    Likes Received:
    57,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Honestly, I love the way the game is designed.

    It's the politics that piss me off. The favoritism towards star players. Get rid of that shit, and the game will flourish. I don't want to see James Harden shoot 25 free throws in a game. That's the one thing that I appreciate most about the Olympics is watching refs simply not give a shit who you are or what team you play for.
     

Share This Page