Politics Emails reveal how foundation donors got access to Clinton and her close aides at State Dept.

Federal Prosecutors WOULD bring her up on charges, period.

 

Capone fooled the FBI and police. OJ was innocent! Many things have been successfully pinned on her.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/11/politics/hillary-clinton-state-department-clinton-foundation/

First on CNN: Inside the debate over probing the Clinton Foundation


(CNN) Officials from the FBI and Department of Justice met several months ago to discuss opening a public corruption case into the Clinton Foundation, according to a US official.

At the time, three field offices were in agreement an investigation should be launched after the FBI received notification from a bank of suspicious activity from a foreigner who had donated to the Clinton Foundation, according to the official.

 

Would if they had anything to charge her with, sure. I agree with that.

barfo

 

Or binary logic isn't good logic at all.

 

Doesn't seem like you've been too successful.

barfo

 

They'd charge her with violation of national security laws. Now it looks like three FBI field offices were told to stand down. And you ask why she's not been indicted.

 

I don't ask that. I know the answer. You are the one asking. I'll repeat the answer for you, though:

Either she's way smarter than all of you conservatives put together, or she isn't actually any more corrupt than the average politician.

Or both, perhaps.

barfo

 

You're in the minority, as usual. Very few people think she's honest, and most think she's a criminal.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-charges-poll/

Washington, DC (CNN)A majority of Americans say they disagree with the FBI's decision not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, according to a new poll.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll, released Monday, found that 56% of American adults disapprove of the FBI's decision, while 35% said they approved. But a majority -- 58% -- also said the issue would not affect their vote in the 2016 presidential election.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/majo...-charge-clinton-emails-poll/story?id=40445344

Overall, 56 percent disapprove of FBI Director James Comey's recommendation not to charge Clinton, while just 35 percent approve. Similarly, 57 percent say the incident makes them worried about how Clinton might act as president if she is elected, with most very worried about it. Just 39 percent feel the issue isn't related to how she would perform as president.

What's that saying again? Fool me once, shame on thee. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me every time, my name is barfo.

 

Or binary logic isn't much logic at all. Smarter than a 5th grader stuff.

 

RICO. Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization. They passed laws and rules to allow prosecution of the Clinton types. Apparently not good enough if the DoJ tells prosecutors to stand down.

 

Seems like you failed. No indictment, and Hillary as president. Hard to see how your 10,000 anti-hillary posts paid off.

barfo

 

Your sweetie Donald is the one actually up on RICO charges.

barfo

 

Three FBI field offices were told to stand down. That's how corrupt things are.

She's guilty as sin. You're in the minority, the sycophants, that think she's not.

 

Just keep telling yourself you are winning, that's what all the other Trump supporters are doing. Probably you are even getting tired of winning so much!

barfo

 

I'm telling myself we're all losing. Either way we put a sleazy person in office. Change only you can believe in. Fool me every time, I'm barfo.

I know more than a handful of Democratic Party operatives. Guys who run congressional campaigns or ballot measure operations. The ones who know Hiliar can't stand her. She's awful in person, she's awful on TV, she has an awful record of public service. Good choice, pal.

 

I know some people too. It's funny how that works.

barfo

 

You need to know someone who will set you straight. And maybe teach you about economics and logic.