I avoid this stuff like the plague. However, I've seen a few demolitions of Vegas casinos and they never fall that evenly. I saw a youtube video of botched demos and it was pretty good.
Hmmm, at this point, I do believe there are legitimate questions about how building 7 collapsed. Building 7 was not hit by a plane, and was 100 yards from the twin towers. It did receive some damage from the towers, but only had small fires on a couple of floors. All of the many building engineers and architects in the video claim that the only way for building 7 to collapse the way it did, free fall with no resistance between floors, was if all 400 connections failed at the exact same time. The fires would not have caused all 400 connections to fail. They also claim none of the connections would have failed due to a fire, let alone all of them failing at the same time. The beams would have started to weaken and bend from the heat from the fires, but the connections are stronger than the beams and would have held. Their conclusion is, the only known cause for all 400 connections failing at the same time would be due to an explosion at all 400 points. There are several videos where a loud explosion can be heard coming from building 7, which support their theory of an explosion inside the building. I am not sure what to believe at this point about building 7. Jet fuel was not a factor since a plane did not hit it. There must have been some sort of explosive devices inside the building, but I have no idea why explosives would be there.
Why? Those of us who want an independent investigation really want to know. To me it's really funny how the same MFs who don't trust government and are arming themselves to repel said government for an imaginary attack, are the same people who believe government's story about 9/11. You know, the same government that taps our phones and lied to us about it, passes the patriot act in the middle of the night to give us the illusion that we actually have rights, and committed slavery and genocide.
Too many fucking weird things that occurred in this to believe this wasn't a cover-up. Pentagon? Shipping evidence out? etc.etc.
The extent of the fire in building 7. It burned for hours. Normally, the fire department shows up and puts out building fires. Fire quite visible after the twin towers fell.
I have not spent enough time checking out this subject, and not sure I want to spend more time on it. BUT. I already have many questions about building 7. There are many irregularities that should have been investigated. There is too much visual and audio proof which creates questions. Here is my first impression gut reaction. “Something” was covered up. My first guess would be building code violations. The fires alone should not have brought building 7 down. Organized crime has a very strong grip on construction in NY City. They may have taken some short cuts while building #7, to increase their profits. Probably enough Govt. officials where paid off to look the other way and then later help with the cover up, and hinder the investigation. Just my wild ass guess for now, which could be a total shit pile of nonsense. But following the money often provides the answers. There is a ton of money floating around in the construction business in NY City.
Fifteen years later and this crap still is being debated? I know it won't be enough for you conspiracy lovers, but the official NIST study didn't say that it was jet fuel melting the columns that caused the collapse: https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-investigation
This is not about the two WTC towers. It is about the third tower that collapsed, which everyone is ignoring, if they even know about it.
The results of this US Dept of Commerce video is WHAT all of the many engineers, architects, and fire investigators in the OPs video are disputing. The Govt’s computer simulation in this video of how the building fell does not match actual video of the collapse. Sound similar to explosions, which the govt report denies, are heard on several video tapes. However, I am not convinced the sound was explosives. It may have been large beams breaking. Testing of the debris would hold the answer. All of the metal and debris from building #7 was removed and never tested for anything, including for explosives or any stress related damage due to fire. This is against all regulations to investigate fires, and hints at a cover-up of some kind. With zero tests results, the video simulation is all voodoo science, and proves nothing. At the very least, the responsible government officials are guilty of failure to properly investigate the collapse, and are trying to cover their own asses with the video.
