USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

If he loses, it will prove there is nobody he could have hired to make him win.

The media is already playing up the hacker connection, should Hiliar lose. What do they know to spin that you don't?

 

If it is $3.7B. Nobody actually knows.

barfo

 

Interesting, if baseless, theory.

Beats me.

barfo

 

No, seriously he's not "fit" to be president

 

$3.7B is the lowest estimate I've seen. Forbes.

 

InfoWars is insanity.

 

Alex Jones for president 2020!

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/10/04/the_horsewhipping_of_donald_trump_131964.html

The Horsewhipping of Donald Trump

To call the massive media obsessed -- eyes roaming crazily in all directions, mouths afoam with horror -- would be an understatement. They fear that the sovereign voters, in their obvious dimwittedness, could put Donald Trump in the White House.

And so the words of abuse tumble forth. The New York Times is unable to take its corporate finger off the fire-alarm button. On Sunday, my favorite left-wing newspaper of record -- to which I have, unaccountably perhaps, subscribed for three decades -- cried aloud that Trump "could have" (legally, yes, but never mind that) avoided paying income tax for 18 years. Not that he "did," just that he "could have," in light of losses from what the Times helpfully characterized as "the financial wreckage he left behind in the 1990s through mismanagement" of various enterprises. Ah, the objectivity, the impartiality, the civic spirit of our journalistic eyes and ears -- the media!

The great American commentariat, online and off, appears to have made up its own mind concerning the choice in November -- and to have dedicated itself to making up everyone else's as well. This, through subjecting the Republican presidential candidate to the journalistic equivalent of a horsewhipping, followed by a trip to the city limits astride a rail.

One of the Times' blacksnake masters, columnist Charles Blow, obliged the curious as the current week began with the remarkable psychiatric diagnosis that Trump is a "puerile, sophomoric sniveler" and a "terroristic man-toddler." Also "a bit of a bigot," "a bully" and "fickle and spoiled and rotten." By the time the media has worked its will in this enlightened manner, Melania Trump will have filed for divorce and a public apology.

One thing you have to say for the "progressive" media's anti-Trump campaign: It takes the readers' and the viewers' minds off Hillary Clinton. That is important, as a deep examination of the lady's credentials could get voters worrying over how much liberty is likely to be left at the end of a Clinton term.

The respectable reasons for a Trump vote, obscured by the cracking of the horsewhip intended for Trump's hindquarters, center less on his opponent's strengths than on her weaknesses. Curiously, for a woman who has spent her life prepping to be the Great Something or Other, Clinton comes across as frail: lacking ideas and convictions of any importance to a country undergoing changes likely to alter its basic character. Her pitiable attempts to humanize herself as a grandmother and good neighbor show that her main interest in life is your vote. Gaining it, she'll figure out what next to do.

 

The stupidity of this rant can be summarized by pointing out that Charles Blow is an opinion writer, not a reporter. So he's just as entitled to write his personal opinion as whoever this guy is, and neither one is indicative of 'media bias'.

Plus, Charles Blow got it right

barfo

 

The writer called Blow a "columnist." He got it right, you didn't.

Blow Hard, too.

The Times' choice of writers does color the commentary of the paper as a whole.

 

Trump does not belong in control because he is out of control. What a nut!

 

This group is committed to looking stupid. Those people is the second row look like Wal Mart junkies

 

I post insults about both Hillary and Clinton.

The reason I posted that picture was because of Elvis. I like Elvis. Elvis endorsing Trump is YUUUGE!