Does this make a difference for any of you die hard Hillary fans? WikiLeaks exposes media's secret support of Clinton http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ks-exposes-medias-secret-support-clinton.html CNN Contributor now a member of the DNC; getting heads up about debate questions, etc. Clinton bashes Trump over Russia praise, but emails show she praised Putin http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...sia-praise-but-emails-show-praised-putin.html Two faced liar? Public face vs private face? Clinton campaign spokeswoman takes shots at Catholics, evangelicals in leaked email exchange http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...cs-evangelicals-in-leaked-email-exchange.html How much more will we learn in the coming days of her corrupt political bullshit race?
Not relevant, it's not critical of Trump and hurts the liar's chances of being elected. Better to report on it after the election otherwise it would undo the media's hard work at getting her elected.
For a guy who says he's not voting for Donald, or supporting him, you sure do defend him a lot. Btw, Donald is losing because of Donald, no one else. paid for by @SlyPokerDog
Let me correct that idiotic post. Donald is a piece of shit because of Donald. Donald is losing to the other piece of shit partly because of that. Living in denial of the fact that the media is all in for Hillary is unbelievable.
Police arrest more people for marijuana use than for all violent crimes combined http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2016/10/police_arrest_more_people_for.html
What have I posted that's pro Trump? The media is a disgrace. Clinton is a criminal. I didn't mention Trump, did I?
"all in"? Is it the medias fault that Donald trips over his child sized hands at almost every turn? They report on what creates viewers. The "media is biased" towards her is lazy thinking.
Delusionidial postioitis I'm going to add multiple words and phrases to the lexicon during the remainder of this election. The best part is how you contradict yourself in the span of two sentences. It isn't the medias fault, they just want to "create viewers"
They're not reporting on what creates viewers. CNN has fallen behind even MSNBC due to it's lopsided coverage. Their agenda is to drive up Trump's unfavorables while shining on the liar's and repeating that campaign's talking points. I don't care if Trump loses or says idiotic things and those get covered. But it is only fair to cover the WikiLeaks revelations about the liar's criminality and with equal zeal. Propaganda is huge. Otherwise the candidates wouldn't buy air time for ads. What the media is doing is providing the liar 24/7 free air time and composing their own ads on her behalf.
Nu uh. All those years you pretended to be pro immigrant was all a front for your love of Donald Trump. Everyone knows. Fuck, I never use green font but I would for this.
Leaked Emails Indicate Clinton Considered Worst Campaign Slogans in History In one 2014 email exchange with top Clinton aides, Roy Spence, a longtime friend and ad maker for Mrs. Clinton, sent over possible slogans to sum up her candidacy. “Neither change nor continuity but The different way. The new way,” Mr. Spence wrote. He went on: “She champions with clear vision and grit. We will build not the partisans ships. But rather the Ship of State flying the American Dream flag.” http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat..._s_hillary_clinton_slogans_not_great_bob.html
I am most definitely for open borders. The wall thing alone is the first of many reasons I won't vote for Trump.
Well, let's see... I'm relying on your summary here on this one - there's nothing untoward about Donna Brazille first working for CNN, then working for the DNC. People are allowed to change jobs. Corey Lewandowski worked for Trump, now works for CNN. Is that also a problem for you? The debate question thing is unclear (whether it actually happened). If it did happen, then obviously that's a problem. Everyone denies it did, though, and says that this is confusing debate questions with TV discussion panel questions. Actually that whole article is pretty interesting, but I don't see anything to object to. Why shouldn't she take a different approach to Putin in public than in private? Being a politician and a diplomat - the job does in fact involve being two-faced, and that's not a bad thing. You really think our leaders should just tell Russia everything they think and do, unfiltered? I have a hard time understanding exactly what Palmieri was trying to say here, but even if she was saying Catholics suck, I don't see that as being a huge scandal. A small scandal, sure. But she's not the candidate. Overall, these leaks have been interesting for sure, but there is a definite lack of smoking guns here so far. barfo
