Yes, the angry white man vote has been severely undercounted. And Democrats are so depressed that they won't vote. If you unskew the polls, you'll realize that women's views aren't actually relevant, because they just vote the way their husbands tell them to. So it's Trump in a landslide! barfo
Pretty much my thought process on this two-piles-of-crap election. Johnson has zero chance, but he's the only vote I can make and not feel dirty. Like you said, the fact that Oregon is knee-deep in Donkeys makes it so I don't really have to worry about my vote having any impact on the outcome of the election. I'm grateful for this because I would really detest having to vote for Hillary. Women everywhere should be embarrassed that someone as oily as her is going to be the first female president.
I agree that seems wholly inappropriate. Frankly, everything coming out about Trump and Clinton doesn't really surprise me. I guess though if I am Clinton's campaign, what were they supposed to do about that email?
There you go. Right, finally. Though it's clear Brazille unethically gave the exact worded question that was to be asked to the campaign. If the questions were given to both campaigns, pre rules, then it would have been OK.
Already answered this. Braniff didn't fly the planes in the pictures. They flew Boeing planes, which did not have armrests that went up/down in 1st class.
What we don't know is what went on via phone calls. http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/new-york-times-gave-hillary-veto/ Danielle Rhoades Ha, vice president of communications for the Times, defended the arrangement. “We were transparent with our readers and disclosed the arrangement in the story,” she wrote in an email. In the 42nd paragraph of the 54-paragraph story, Leibochich explained the deal: “In early July, after much back and forth with the campaign and reluctance on my part, I decided to take the campaign up on its offer of an off-the-record conversation with Clinton. I figured I would use the opportunity at Bretton Woods to ask Clinton directly for an interview or at least to let me do part of our conversation on the record. She chose the latter.” But the disclosure did not exactly specify Clinton and her team would be allowed to determine, retroactively, which parts of the conversation were on or off the record. Leibovich emailed campaign Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri on July 7, 2015, to try to lobby for a batch of quotes. I'm pretty sure they don't offer Trump the same courtesy.
The gift that keeps giving. These emails do indicate a cover up. And Obama lied about not knowing about the illegal server. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/politics/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-emails.html?_r=0
My god! Hillary's email use looks bad??? This is the first I've heard of that! Thank god for Wikileaks! barfo
'smacks of' does not mean 'is'. Someone writing an opinion in an email doesn't prove a crime was committed. Typing something in capital letters doesn't make it true. Your hate doesn't hurt anyone but you. barfo
LOL, this is quite funny: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...in-dark-shocked-over-insane-server-setup.html
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/ 1. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence) 2. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open trade and open borders” 3. Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists 4. Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones 5. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies 6. Hillary's campaign wants "unaware" and "compliant" citizens 7. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith 8. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress. 9. Bribery: King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million to have meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons 10. Latinos are "needy". Latino outreach is "taco bowl engagement" (90 more at the link, along with links to the wikileaks emails that support the 100 claims)
