Maybe because Trump's emails are already out there for the world to see. It's called every porn site on the net.
I think that's an excellent question. Are wiki leaks motives simply about transparency or more about destabilising our country? I suspect there's a lot of rooting interests against US hegemony and this could be part of a coordinated effort to tip the balance of power. Granted, Hillary did this to herself and the Deep State is grossly undemocratic and opaque and is harmful to the long term health of the republic. Trouble is Trump might destroy us completely. There's plenty of historic precedent.
Your telling me they couldn't hack Trump? But, then I guess Trump is already attacking himself...I thought Assange got his internet taken away
They simply want transparency. They are not targeting her and only her. You should visit their site and see the data they have on other things.
I don't think you understand how WikiLeaks works. They don't target anyone. They simply offer the information that is given to them. And before you say "RUSSIANS", they've already went on record and said their information for this Clinton fiasco was not from Russia.
They've been proven to not be quite as transparent as folks think....WikiLeaks is not the supreme court of world govt.....if you can hack internet info they're sure on the internet. I've visited their page and they list links to periodicals and jouranlist's articles....so because they're on their site, they aren't corruptible? All Hail WikiLeaks......the supreme council of internet law enforcement!!!!! right......
you choose to believe them....and that they can't be corrupted...ok....I personally don't give WikiLeaks that much credit....and what did you think the Russians would say?
You have no idea what you're rambling on about. Each email contains a unique digital key, which is actually a unique number so huge that it is almost impossible to guess, fake, or copy. The key, which is automatically created by the email server at Clinton’s organization, is added to each email as it is first sent, so that if the message is later altered, the key will show other email servers that the original message did not come from the claimed server, or that it has been altered. The proper name of the process is “DomainKeys Identified Mail,” which is shortened to DKIM. DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) lets an organization take responsibility for a message that is in transit. The organization is a handler of the message, either as its originator or as an intermediary. Their reputation is the basis for evaluating whether to trust the message for further handling, such as delivery. Technically DKIM provides a method for validating a domain name identity that is associated with a message through cryptographic authentication. The digital keys in the messages fit into a widely used encryption system that is not controlled by Wikileaks or any other group. When security experts test the Wikileaks’ email keys against the shared encryption system, they find that the emails are unmodified. The DKIM key is practically impossible to forge, Robert Graham, a principal at Errata Security told Breitbart News. Readers can conduct the DKIM tests themselves. For example, the commercial email program Thunderbird allows a “DKIM” add-on, which automatically checks the key in each message against the shared encryption system. http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/10/yes-we-can-validate-wikileaks-emails.html#.WBuhmH-7qHt
let's just stop your rambling at "almost impossible"......that makes you think you know what you're rambling on about
