Shabazz, Jake, and Pat are currently 6th, 7th, and 8th in the entire league in offensive rating right now: http://stats.nba.com/league/player/#!/advanced/?sort=OFF_RATING&dir=1
Seems like Ed Davis was number one or two for a stretch last season if I remember correctly, which is always a crapshoot
Fuck yeah! That's why Mötley Crüe was always my fave band. Come to think of it, Läymän does have suspiciously luscious hair.
If he not perform on the court hell yea money don't win games. Players on the court performing up to standard does win games. I said before I don't care how much you make it what you do on the court to help win games what really matters.
They were worth 12 pts each for the Warriors. That team is going to be good if they can score impossible amounts like that.
I understand from a fans point of view but what about the GM/Owners point of view? Is Neil ready to put his tail between his legs on this one?
there was a LOT of over dribbling last night, it killed us and has been our achilles heel so far this yr - stupid turnovers killing our momentum, we really have to clean this up
King as soon as ET entered the game there were two straight turnovers in a row. Both by Plumlee. But even then they were maintaining the lead. It was when they had four 2nd team players in the game ....along with Dame that the momentum changed. It was not just one player's fault....they just did not play well together while Ian Clark went off.
Excellent point. People say it was only garbage time, but Layman made the shots that others often miss in garbage time.
I liked Jake's demeanor last night. He shot the lights out and could have acted all giddy for his individual performance, but he knew the score and acted accordingly. Makes me think he's a team player all the way. His stroke looks real though. I'd love to get a look at him when the bullets are real.
There's not much to work with here for "Layman" nicknames, but jake-of-all-trades could work... http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/layman
