I most certainly call it punking when the Nobel Peace Prize winner was saved from going to war by Putin's intervention. Oh, the irony.
I don't know if it's true either. But the press/media has special protection in our system, and it seems they abuse the right without the public receiving any benefit these days. Perhaps unsubstantiated claims, accusing people without proof, should receive it's proper rebuke in some way within the same system. Not law suits but via automatic triggers. I am more concerned about where we are going, lead by Clinton and the Democrats than any fear I have of the Russians. It appalls me to hear Hillary blame the Russian or Putin for someone, anyone exposing the shady deeds she or her people are involved in. After all, our press should actually be uncovering some of this skulduggery on their own, but they do not. We only have Wiki doing the job, while under threat from the government. Not right!
the irony is the empowerment you like to give dictators and the idea that Putin saved the US from a war is....well.....sort of like you trying to make Russia great again......it's ok...I didn't think you'd read those articles posted by informed journalists....you counter with Putin to the rescue!!!!!! It's glaring apparent that you have more fear of Democrats than Russians....how do you come to the conclusion that Putin is the voice of reason in Middle eastern politics......he has one ally there....only one. To trust Putin more than Obama concerning foreign diplomacy is your choice......and Trumps....got it
by the way...I believe our stance in the middle east has saved a lot of lives from being in harms way....Obama has done more to promote peace than Putin could even fathom....he's a warlord
Yes, if you have proof, not just a vague possibility, that government favors were traded for cash, please do post it. But if it's just more 'oh, she's obviously guilty because I think so', you can skip. barfo
Maybe, maybe not. Assange says otherwise, but again all they do is collect information given to them via their "drop box". But Assange said himself he has the evidence of Saudi Arabia funding ISIS.
Sure: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE131801_a.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...oney-saudi-arabia-qatar-funding-a7397211.html watch the video I guess. If you want more, find it yourself on the Wikileaks site.
Uncovering corruption is important. But, you really think the press should be stealing documents and dumping them online? It doesn't bother you that innocent people might be damaged by that? And that it's criminal behavior? Anything goes as long as it uncovers corruption? How about we kidnap people and waterboard them until they confess whatever knowledge of corruption they might have? Is that going too far? barfo
So according to Twitter Hillary is now a satanist due to some kind of wikileak? I'm at work so I can't dig too deep but it's the #1 trend on twitter. Or was. This seems plausible.
Maybe I'll read that second link later, don't have time right now, too long. The first one seems to just be saying that bad guys contribute to charity, and bad guys also fund terrorism. Not clear to me what the issue is, other than that bad guys exist. barfo
You think it's absurd that political actors make moves and counter-moves behind the scenes to effect a particular outcome? The West and Russia have been natural adversaries going all the way back to the fall of the Tsars (and before that really if you look at the Crimean war, The Franco-Russian wars). Big nation-states with big ambitions are always going to have friction. That Russia would attempt to sow chaos and manipulate its adversaries through spycraft, propaganda, and statecraft seems like a given to me.
You wanted proof that Saudi Arabia provides money to ISIS. I provided. That is all. Assange states Clinton is aware of this and that they do it clandestine. Clinton also takes pay for play favors from this same country, while in the State Dept. This is corruption and likely more.
No, John Podesta visited a "spirit cooking" demonstration. Apparently he's into satanic rituals, or thinks its interesting. I didn't even know this was a thing. But fuck, it's weird.
No, I didn't ask for proof of that. ok. well, if it is happening, then it is good that Clinton is aware of it. That's the part I was asking for proof of. barfo
