OT RipCityTwo Fantasy Football

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BonesJones, Aug 25, 2016.

  1. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    7,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...fuck the Packers and A-fraud's egotistical "leadership"!
     
  2. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    @HAAK72 Looks like you need 17 points from Giovanni Bernard to win. Gonna be close.
     
  3. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    7,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...luckily the Giants have suspect D vs RB's!
     
  4. trailblazer18

    trailblazer18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    4,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Skip running the ball, they need to throw it to AJ Green every play! I need 14 points from him tonight! But I guess I would like to see Bones lose as well (for playoff seeding :) ). So how about Green has a huge first half and then they can run the ball the rest of the way.
     
  5. selloutking

    selloutking BALL DON'T LIE!

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2015
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    665
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Redmond, OR
    that's all fine
    long as all the TD's are eifert in the red zone
     
  6. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,460
    Likes Received:
    7,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...apparently a lot of W's are riding on the game tonight!
     
  7. trailblazer18

    trailblazer18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    4,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    I voted to allow the Gronk trade, but don't really get it. I understand Gronk hasn't done too much this season and there is injury concern, but...it's Gronk. I feel like you could have gotten a little more for him.
     
  8. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I want you guys to vote to veto. There's no way that trade is even close to fair.
     
  9. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
  10. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    In the past 5 games:
    Matthews has gone over 8 points ONCE.
    Fleener has gone over 7 points ONCE.
    Gronk has gone over 16 points 4 TIMES.

    Vote on it so that I don't have to do it upright and piss off this guy myself.
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2016
  11. trailblazer18

    trailblazer18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    4,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    I understand that sentiment, but Gronk is possibly battling injury now and hasn't done normal Gronk stuff this season yet, so I voted to allow it. Even though it is an unfair trade in my mind.

    Also, as the commissioner of the league, not sure if it is appropriate to lobby to veto a trade...haha. Are you David Stern? :)
     
  12. trailblazer18

    trailblazer18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    4,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    I take that back, Gronk has done quite of bit of Gronk things this season.
     
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Most commissioners would straight up veto it so in my mind I'm being righteous lmao. And what do you mean he hasn't done normal Gronk stuff? Over the 4 weeks before last he averaged 22.5 points per game. His injury also isn't serious and he might miss a week, maximum.
     
  14. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    That's what I'm saying. Just comparing statlines shows how unfair it is.
     
  15. trailblazer18

    trailblazer18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,068
    Likes Received:
    4,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Updated my vote...but I blame you if there is any fallout over it..haha
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  16. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Lol the dude doesn't post on here. We were struggling to get 10 so I added him then we got 11 so I added my cousin (Gear) who doesn't post on here either.

    Problem is this is the dude I watch football with at Buffalo. If I vetod it myself there would probably be no buffalo on Sunday lmao.
     
    trailblazer18 likes this.
  17. RipCityWarrior

    RipCityWarrior Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2015
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I agreed to it because Mathews has been the best RB I've been offered for him (my biggest need)!and he also added a serviceable TE to get me by for a week or so if needed. Yes Gronk is dynamic but he also gets hurt a lot. I get it though if you all veto the deal though
     
  18. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    You could get a lot better RB if you tried. That's the problem. And Fleener isn't serviceable, 4 out of the past 5 weeks he's had 7 points or less. Its like you're trading C.J. McCollum for Willie Cauley-Stein and Anthony Tolliver.
     
  19. RipCityWarrior

    RipCityWarrior Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2015
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Well when you put it like that.... veto away! My basketball knowledge is definitely better than my football.
     
  20. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    The logic makes sense if you were getting better players, you're just getting crappy players for the best TE in the league.

    You can go vote to veto it. It needs two more veto votes. I don't want to do it myself.
     

Share This Page