OT RipCityTwo Fantasy Football

Matthew Berry chimes in on to veto or not (hint; it is always not unless there is collusion):
http://www.espn.com/fantasy/footbal...tball-picks-sleepers-busts-trade-talk-week-11

 

I will give you two lesser WRs that would act as your WRs 2 and 3. Or maybe Pryor. Like I said I have too much depth and need to consolidate it to upgrade my starters, not downgrade one position to upgrade another.

 

Is two of Marshall, Moncreif, and C.Coleman not enough?

 

I still think Ingram, Hilton, and Marshall would be a good trade both read l ways for Leveon Bell tbh. You'd upgrade your WRs big time. But I know he's your guy lol.

 

Who do you want for Newton?

 

"There's a special place in hell reserved for the people who veto just because it's a deal that didn't involve them or because "it's part of their strategy." That's not strategy, that's being a jerk. It's being a coward. It's, frankly, not being good enough to win on your own. Someone beat you to a good deal? It is what it is -- part of the game, same as beating another player to the waiver wire or getting a win with the second-lowest score of the week because you happen to face the lowest scorer.

And if you are a commissioner and you don't enforce this rule -- you allow vetoes to happen, or worse, you veto them yourself -- you wipe away any of the good you have done by being a commissioner."

From the article. Bones you have a lot of soul searching to do...haha

 

No. Reed is a top 3 TE each week. I would possible consider Pryor and Moncreif. I just hate that Pryor has a bye week 13.

 

What about Landry?

 

Haha normally that's how it is but what is a trade as egregious as that one was then it has to be vetoed.

 

Landry is slumping. By trading Reed I am downgrading that position, so I want a solid upgraded WR to pair with Green. Not worried about depth. If I can't get that upgraded WR, I'll stand pat, and hope Doug Martin can fulfill his potential and run with 2 WR's the rest of the way.

 

Are you willing to trade Murray?

 

No

 

I can give you WRs and/or a lesser RB. Rivers+Marshall?

 

I don't really need WRs

 

Did I hear Ingram went out with a concussion @BonesJones ? You could use Hyde! Hyde for Landry.

 

Tevin Coleman will be my starter. Not trying to trade a starter for a bench player. Trying to consolidate for a better player.

 

Bench player? Hyde was a stud before he got injured. I guess I will reap the benefits of him coming back healthy

 

T.Y. Hilton is available. Looking to package T.Y. with Ingram or Coleman for a good 2nd RB.

 

Cmon @HAAK72 there wasn't one top 25 player in that whole deal!

 

i
I offered you Hyde and Reed already for him. You won't get a much better offer than that.